Perjury
mukund
(Querist) 17 July 2014
This query is : Resolved
doctor has given letter to management against
medical Representative as result MR lost his job.doc' s letter is tutored by company.doc claims he remembers MR has not visited him after one year. what action can be taken against doc?
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 17 July 2014
No offence is made out against the doctor in the given facts.
mukund
(Querist) 17 July 2014
company has produced carbon copy of MR's daily report in the court, they are hiding original copy of MR' report, what is remedy?
Rudrawar Narayanreddy
(Expert) 18 July 2014
give notice to produce the original to the other side advocate
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 18 July 2014
You may make an application before the Court to direct the opposite party to produce the original document failing which the photocopy shall not be relied upon in the evidence.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 18 July 2014
Agree with the expert raj kumar makkad ji.
mukund
(Querist) 18 July 2014
there are two copies of the report.
1) first one white color. company has not produced neither original white color copy or it's xerox.
2)they produced second copy which is carbon copy.
3) two copy copies together comprises report.
4) company is hiding white color first copy from court
malipeddi jaggarao
(Expert) 18 July 2014
First of all your query is not clear. Secondly, what does it make any difference if it is original copy or second copy or xerox copy you are speaking.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 18 July 2014
If u r sure, Original is different from Copy, insist court to produce Original + Examine Dr.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 18 July 2014
please post all facts of your query . you are basically in response to replies from experts giving further details of query
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 18 July 2014
You have been very clearly advised to file an application before the court directing the opposite party to produce the originals of the copy they submitted, without reading the answers, you are coming again and again with the same question. Also, you were told to furnish more details but you remain unbthered about it.
mukund
(Querist) 19 July 2014
mr kalaiselvan,
you have not answered my question in the first place, above all you have commented without application of mind.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 19 July 2014
Mr. Mukund! This is not the way, you are dictating experts. Had you applied your own mind, you might not have raised subsequent query when your original query had duly been attended by the experts.
malipeddi jaggarao
(Expert) 20 July 2014
MR.Mukund, you did not answer my qauery seeking clarification. We are not here to work under dictats of persons who seek the free legal help.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 20 July 2014
MR.MUKUND OFTEN RAISE QUERIES HERE.GUESS,HE IS PROFESSIONAL.
HE SHOULD KNOW THAT A SECONDARY EVIDENCE IS NOT ADMISSIBLE UNLESS THE LOSS OF ORIGINAL IS PROVED BY PARTY SEEKING IT'S ADMISSION.
THE NEXT THING HE IS EXPECTED TO UNDERSTAND THAT ALL CARBON COPIES PREPARED WITH ORIGINAL
SIMULTANEOUSLY WOULD BE TREATED TO BE ORIGINAL.
ONLY XEROX OF ORIGINAL OR OF CARBON COPY WOULD BE TREATED SECONDARY EVIDENCE.
HE SHOULD ALSO KNOW THAT HE IS EXPECTED TO HAVE MIND FOR HIS BRIEFS NOT OTHERS.
COPY CAT CAN NOT WORK IN THIS FIELD, THOUGH HELPFUL.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 20 July 2014
the author should not be replied anymore .
mukund
(Querist) 20 July 2014
mr prabhakar singh,
your non application of mind is once again visible.
Guest
(Expert) 20 July 2014
Mr. Mukund,
As per your profile you are a CEO of some organisation. So, before teaching lesson to the members about applying their mind, first of all, you should make it clear in which capacity you are concerned with the problem, as a CEO of the company terminating job of the company, or in the capacity of a medical representative, or in support of the doctor, or just for your academic knowledge?
Further, if the case pertains to your own company, can you please make it clear whether your company has such a poor financial position that the company is not able to hire services of some capable legal consultant and is compelled to seek free advice through this forum, besides labelling them also with not applying their minds.
