Quashing of domestic violence act on basis of mutual compromise
RITESH RANJAN
(Querist) 04 June 2015
This query is : Resolved
Respected Jurists,
Kindly provide the sections under which a case under DV Act which has been amicably compromised BE QUASHED/COMPOUNDED BY A HIGH COURT other than Cr.P.C. 482.
If possible please also mention citations in support of your solution.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Ritesh Ranjan
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 04 June 2015
Can U provide the case history briefly
Guest
(Expert) 04 June 2015
Academic query without any background case history!
RITESH RANJAN
(Querist) 04 June 2015
Respected Jurists,
Before 1000 Hrs. tomorrow, I will put the case before you. It's not mere academic query but, related to very me only.
Thanking you,
Ritesh Ranjan
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 04 June 2015
Mr.Rajan,
When U had a time frame in UR mind then why did U post it today wasting the time of the busy experts?
RITESH RANJAN
(Querist) 04 June 2015
Respected Experts, it was a response on your kind remarks. And meanwhile, I have decided not to post any personal details before them who have occupied the title of experts and on one and all humble query they tag the same "No answers for academic queries".
IS IT SO THAT EXPERTS FIND THEMSELVES UNABLE TO ANSWER ACADEMIC QUERIES". Then, it is humbly advised to the learned Administrators to make such queries in EXPERTS forum a paid service.
Thanks to all the EXPERTS who are unwilling to answer a query which is self-explanatory and rather interested in having a long long stories as litigation generally contain.
Please remain this query open for some one who wishes to help the needy.
Thanks to busy experts.
Ritesh Ranjan
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 04 June 2015
Wasting the time of the experts means we could have devoted the time to some other query.Why do U get exited Sir.
RITESH RANJAN
(Querist) 04 June 2015
Respected Sainath Devalla Sir, Do you enquire the whole history-sheet for a query. How a common man serving the Govt. be able to provide all details that also on NET.
Yes, I do admit, I have gained knowledge through self study regarding all Matrimonial Disputes be it Civil or Criminal. I have represented myself before Hon'ble SDJM to Hon'ble High Court and even Pious Supreme Court. But, for knowledge that also for saving the self-live and family has no limits. For so, I have posted my query regarding SELF in TRUTH. I am sure those who projecting self EXPERTShave no answer about the instant query. May I submit, it a question asked by an Hon'ble Chief Justice of a pious High Court to the petitioner's seasoned Senior Advocate. I know IT'S REALLY HARD TO ANSWER this one. But, there is no harm in admitting I HAVE NO ANWER rather posing as EXPERTS and posting excuse as busy ones. Regards, please let the query open for those who really want to help and are capable...
Thanks... please don't waste your time on this post IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE ANSWER. Good wishes with REGARDS
RITESH RANJAN
RITESH RANJAN
(Querist) 04 June 2015
Respected self claimed EXPERTS, having no time to answer academic queries, remain calm and study. Either request the learned Administrator to let me barred from this site but, with logic or let the title of EXPERT vacant for deserving one. The LAW is for CLASS AND COMMON but it's knowledge is not so COMMON and the rarest is to help someone who really is a needy.
THINK AND INTROSPECT...
RITESH RANJAN
Dr R SHANMUGA SUNDARAMM
(Expert) 04 June 2015
Dear Ritesh Ranjan
If you want close the DV case by mutual compromise, better you can request the Court by your consul to transfer the case to Lok Adalat. In Lok Adalat you can close the case by Mutually.
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 05 June 2015
The author is unnecessarily getting exited and going beyond the limits and boundaries,hence no replies to academic and arrogant queries..
RITESH RANJAN
(Querist) 05 June 2015
Thanks Shri Shanmuga Sundaram Sir... Today I will discuss with my lawyer...But, I have already prayed before the Hon'ble High Court to quash the FIR U/s 482 Cr.P.C. which contains IPC 498A, 506... alongwith DV Act...
Hon'ble Justice Sir has agreed upon 498 A etc.... but, has asked my old aged lawyer to find case laws regarding invoking Cr.P.C. 482 to quash DV Act. For so, I placed the question before this forum. Please help.
Guest
(Expert) 05 June 2015
A great advice to the advisors by an advice seeker!
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 05 June 2015
His addressing as self claimed experts itself illustrates he is here only to annoy the experts with his irrelevant attitude.
Guest
(Expert) 05 June 2015
Mr. Ritesh Ranjan,
Your statement, "self claimed EXPERTS" is quite objectionable. If you feel that the members rying to solve the problems of others are self acclaimed experts, you may better request the administration to delete the whole list of the members, which the administration is maintaining at the page of Hall of Fame at the following page, which you can also access by clicking at the link of "Expert" at the top of this page:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/default.asp#.VXFqXFLxphm
If you feel that the whole list consists of self acclaimed experts and anyone can enlist his name at this website, as expert, why not you should also try to register yourself also as a self acclaimed expert?
Earlier also, you have been posting quite a vague academic queries and also showing enough of arrogance towards experts, but could never prove that you had been facing such type of problems, which you posted.
Even if your present query relates to some real case, there can be several alternates to defend a case depending upon the nature and background of the case. No common defence strategy can be adopted in all criminal law cases. But, you are shy of stating the basic facts and the background of the case.
In the absence of appropriate background and basic necessary facts, if different experts start giving varied responses, you would get confused and are likely to form unduly negative views about them, when you have already tried to cast aspersons on the experts without any reason or rhyme. Nobody would like to get his image tarnished by giving you replies merely on the basis of their own supposition or presumption in the absence of the basic necessary facts.
Earlier, before 20 hours, you agreed, "Before 1000 Hrs. tomorrow, I will put the case before you. It's not mere academic query but, related to very me only." But one hour thereafter you had a second thougt and stated, "I have decided not to post any personal details before them who have occupied the title of experts and on one and all humble query they tag the same "No answers for academic queries".
Naturally, it can safely be concluded that you don't have any background of the case and the present query is nothing except an academic query.
OUT OF YOUR VAGUE QUERY, THE FOLLOWING PERTIMENT QUESTIONS DO ARISE:
1) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF ASKING citations in support of solution BY THE EXPERTS, WHEN BEING MERELY A TRANSLATOR IN SOME OFFICE AND NOT BEING A LAWYER, YOU CANNOT APPROPRIATELY USE THAT?
2) ON WHAT SPECIFIC GROUND YOU HAVE EXPECTED THAT THE EXPERTS SHOULD DO THE HOME WORK FREE OF CHARGE FOR YOUR OWN PAID LAWYER? WHY HE SHOULD NOT DO HIS OWN HOME WORK, WHEN HE WOULD HAVE RECEIVED HIS FEE IN THE CASE?
3) WHY YOU HAVE NOT APPROACHED YOUR LAWYER TO SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM? IF ASKED HIM, WHAT IS HIS SOLUTION?
All these situations very clearly hint towards your academic query.
Academic queries do not have short answers of merely a sentence OR of 2-3 lines. Any answer has to discuss all the pros & cons of various situations of the type of a case. Once an expert starts answering academic query, you would certainly raise a number of supplememtary questions till you get satisfaction to be able to solve your academic exercise.
So, better pay appropriate fee to any one of the experts here and get your solution. But in case of a real problem, you would still be required to state the full facts of the case. However, if you hesitate in sharing the basic necessary facts, you could have avoided to post your query here on this site, rather would have approached some local lawyer to sort out your problem by paying him his consultancy fee. You can still approach a local lawyer, if you assume the experts here to be self acclaimed experts.
BEST OF LUCK!
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 05 June 2015
I appreciate the reply of Dhingraji as absolutely apt for academic authors.I support every word of Dhingraji.
RITESH RANJAN
(Querist) 05 June 2015
Respected Shri P.S. Dhingra Sir, It was on your wise advise only when I decided not to go ahead with the matter of a person impersonating as DDO and signing loan documents. And, now I feel nice in my heart and mind regarding this because as rightly said then by the true experts here that it may implicate my Union members also.
In this instant case, it's true that it is related to me only. I am all open as have nothing to hide. You may understand that I have guts to upload my picture with profile here. You can verify my details from my facebook profile. Sir, I am a person who worships 'teachers' and always ready to learn. How can I make disgust to true experts like Shri Shanmuga Sundaram Sir, Sudhir Kumar Sir, and one other expert I couldn't recall his name now from Calcutta and of course you Sir and alikes. I EXPRESS MY UNCONDITIONAL APOLOGY TO THE TRUE EXPERTS if my words has gone against their grace. But, still I stand with my epression for SELF CLAIMED 'EXPERT' title holders. And regarding money, you can understand how a litigant is drained of money roped in IPC 498A and DV Act. Even the agony and present condition has been elaborately expressed by the Hon'ble Judicial Fora. I am also spending. But, my lawyer Sir is very old. I do not actually can not discharge him because he was with me in my harsh times. That's why I do study a lot and gratefully avail services of forums like this esteemed one and then provide all solutions found and suggested to my lawyer.
Any way, let's conclude and let this query open for someone who understands and is willing to provide some workable solution.
Regards,
Ritesh Ranjan
Guest
(Expert) 05 June 2015
Mr. Ritesh,
It's ok, but manners and attiquette on the part of a knowledge/ guidance seeker matters much.
Also, a querist must know that he cannot compel any exper to advise him unless the expert is satisfied with the bare necessary facts and the background of the case. In legal parlance, any reply can go wrong, if is made merely on supposition basis in the absence of appropriate description of the problem. If some one poses some question that means he is almost ready to solve the problem, provided he is made aware of the facts.
Nobody here is interested to go through the CV or the picture of the querist. The aim of most of the experts is to solve the real problems of hapless querists that too free of cost spending their precious time and huge cost for maintenance of their infrastructure. If their voluntary help is not appreciated that must not also be depreciated.
If you see your own query added with your supplementary posts, you can find plenty of contradictions and vague description.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 21 June 2015
For an amicable quashing or amicably compromised DV (in your language), you need not approach high court, the complainant can file a petition before the trial court stating the she would like to withdraw her complaint under the act pending before the court due to compromise arrived out of court, this may even be referred to Lok adalat either for mediation or settlement or both.
