Reg property
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 17 December 2022
This query is : Resolved
My great grandfather govindasamy with his brother in law appasamy had bought 20.89 acres in 1911, Govindasamy mortgaged his share with his brother chinnasamy in1912,
Appasamy sold his share in 1917 to venkatasamy,and later venkatasamy sold his share to periasamy,
Both Govindasamy and periasamy were in enjoyment of 20.89 acres,In 1921 there was a dispute between Govindasamy and periasamy,and they had partitioned the land between them as self acquired property and will belong to their respective families,it was a registered partition.
In 1993 the heirs of chinnasamy,filed suit for partition claiming half of Govindasamy share by claiming as joint family property,and providing that mortgage as primary evidence,our counsel filed application for rejection of plaint under order7 rule 11 for no cause of action and it was dismissed in1996,again they filed in district Court In 1998 and in 2001,they withdrew the cause with leave to file fresh appeal,after 10 years in 2010 again they filed the same suit for partition.
We had no knowledge of 1921 partition,but Govindasamy only son and my grandfather annasamy had sold 79cents from his share of 10.44 acres in 1969,and partitioned the remaining with his sons in 1970,we had marked both the documents in the respective court,but we failed to produce 1921 document.
They had said in 1921 there was a oral partition between Govindasamy and periasamy which was not true,now the district Court dismissed their suit on the ground of limitation(3 years),They made an appeal in madras high Court in 2019 and in 2020 the court had allowed their appeal and granted preliminary decree,we filed a review by producing the 1921 partition document,that has not come for listing till date,now our counsel say that let them file final decree them we will file that 1921 document and fight in high court,but the heirs of chinnasamy knowing about that we had got 1921 document they now are not ready to file for final decree,it has been more than 2years,
Kindly advise
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 17 December 2022
They had said that there was a oral partition between Govindasamy and chinnasamy in1921
P. Venu
(Expert) 18 December 2022
Pending Review Petition is no constraint for filing the Final Decree Application. And, at that stage, the trial court is unlikely go behind the preliminary decree.
You may take steps for expediting the Review Petition. But the Courts seldom admits review unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record.
kavksatyanarayana 
(Expert) 18 December 2022
The same query was posted today in this forum and is repeated, but both have replied.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 19 December 2022
Too long and repeated story.
It would be better to consult and engage a local prudent lawyer for proper appreciation of facts/ documents, professional advise and necessary proceeding.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 20 December 2022
The final decree application is consequent upon the passing of an order of preliminary decree, hence you cannot force the decree holder to file a petition for final decree.
Your grievances in the form of an appeal before high court against the preliminary decree was dismissed by high court, therefore you may prefer an appeal against that judgment or file review petition before the same high court against the order and try to introduce the document discovered lately along with your review petition, however it is not essential for the appellate court to into the newly added items to arrive at a decision in your favor.
