Robery/attack/threaten
Neeraj Jha
(Querist) 11 June 2018
This query is : Resolved
Hi Experts,
My friend has a mobile shop in a town, on 05 Jun 18 a man asked for data cable and at the same time he was showing some mobile sets to other customers the suddenly my friend noticed that that man stolen a mobile set and when he asked for checking then he threatened him and told to come back soon, after 30 min he came back with 2 other culprits with heavy wooden sticks and hit on my friend's head then my friend become unconscious then those 3 culprits damaged the shop counters and robbed mobile sets and money.
the situation has been described before local police and they lodged FIR u/s 34, 323, 427, 506 and not applied the relevant sections i.e. 307 and 390 for robbery.
My friend has 12 stiches on head and not any fracture
I am deep disappointing with police and don't know how to get the sections updated. please guide me
AKSHANSH SINGHAL
(Expert) 16 June 2018
You can write to Superintendent of Police, mentioning the details of the incident along with the name of officer who wrote FIR and request for registering fresh FIR incorporating all the details mentioned by you through registered post.
Guest
(Expert) 16 June 2018
Dear Mr. Nadim Vasta,
Being a lawyer of the Supreme Court, the topmost Court, as per the description of your profile, you could have insisted the police to quote relevant sections in the case.
By the way, as a Supreme Court Lawyer would you like to clarify, how do you justify imposition of sections 307 and 390?
Guest
(Expert) 16 June 2018
Dear Mr. Nadim Vasta,
Being a lawyer of the Supreme Court, the topmost Court, as per the description of your profile, you could have insisted the police to quote relevant sections in the case.
By the way, as a Supreme Court Lawyer would you like to clarify, how do you justify imposition of sections 307 and 390?
Guest
(Expert) 16 June 2018
Dear Mr. Nadim Vasta,
Being a lawyer of the Supreme Court, the topmost Court, as per the description of your profile, you could have insisted the police to quote relevant sections in the case.
By the way, as a Supreme Court Lawyer would you like to clarify, how do you justify imposition of sections 307 and 390?
