Sc st atrocity act

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 01 July 2024 This query is : Resolved
Caste based slur in Office Chamber that too after office hours attract Atrocity Case

Follow Query

Report Abuse

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate Online

(Expert) 01 July 2024
If the quarrel was caste based then a complaint in this regard is certainly maintainable.

kavksatyanarayana (Expert) 01 July 2024
Did you talk about a particular person or in general? However, you should not talk about sc/sts.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 02 July 2024
yes anywhere, any time

SIVARAMAPRASAD KAPPAGANTU (Expert) 02 July 2024
You have not elaborated on the "Caste-based slur". In the context of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the term “public view” is used instead of “public place. “Within public view” extends beyond physical public places and encompasses situations where the public can witness the offense, even if it occurs in private spaces. The focus is on visibility and audibility rather than strict geographical boundaries. If an incident is observable by others, it falls within the scope of the Act. Accordingly, you may conclude about the Office Chamber you mentioned in your query. Whether it is an offense or not is not decided as to when it is committed viz. within office hours or outside the officer hours.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries