Streedhan
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 05 October 2011
This query is : Resolved
If wife gives receipt of dowry articles, streedhan etc at mahila police station after filing of 498A, 406 etc. In the receipt she wrote in her own language that she had receipt dowry items, jewellery items, streedhan, clothes etc as per the list enclosed and in the list items of streedhan was not mentioned but she wrote the same in receipt at mahila thana.
Now one year after she filed DV case and in which she claimed u/s 19(8) that husband family has given my dowry items but still my streedhan are with them and she falsely put the list of more then 50 tolas of gold articles.
My queries are ---
1.) Can this thing is fit for filing perjury against wife as there is contradiction in receipt and what she claimed in DV and both the cases are still pending in lower courts
2.)How will it help me in fighting my DV case
3.)Any other suggestion / course of action for this.
Thanks in Advance.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 05 October 2011
Was all the things according to her submitted list in Mahila Thana or your list in Mahila Thana.
If it was as per her list, her claim is unsustainable.
If it was as per your list, her claim might be sustainable.
In any case, when 406 is filed, DV court won't ask you to return the articles. The DV court can order restoration on the proof that the same things are still in your possession and not on mere allegations.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 05 October 2011
Thanks M.Shonee
Actually the list submitted by her with FIR was like that --
A. Gold and Silver Articles
B. House Hold Articles
C. Other Item to Wife like clothes etc
D. Money Given to Husband Family
There was nothing mentioned by her about the jewellery items given by her husband family to her in the above mentioned list bur while giving receipt she in her own hand writing stated like that she recd jewellery items, streedhan, dowry item and clothes as per list enclosed.
My query was that can i file perjury at this stage against her that she had submitted wrong facts to the court that even though she recd streedhan but again she is claiming under DV act
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 05 October 2011
But in her FIR for 498A and 406 she claimed that streedhan must also be returned to her by her in laws without having reference to list of gold/silver articles given to her by her in laws
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 06 October 2011
Receipt given by her is complete and now she cannot take plea that certain item in part was returned or not returned. This is a fi case fo filing prejury.
