LCI Learning
Master the Basics of Legal Drafting in All Courts. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raj Kumar Makkad (Adv P & H High Court Chandigarh)     03 January 2010

Minor Discripencies to be Ignored if case otherwise proved-S

2009 SCCL.COM 3183(Case No: Criminal Appeal No. 1368 of 2003)
Bhagwati Prasad Appellant versus State of M.P. Respondent
Date of Decision(mm/dd/yy): 12/3/2009.
Judge(s): Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran, Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Verma.
Subject Index: Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 148, 149 and 302 — all the accused persons, formed an unlawful assembly and by way of common object, committed murder of deceased — incident arose on account of opening of the aqueduct for irrigation — no previous enmity between the parties — trial Court acquitted all the accused persons of all the offences — High Court held that the traumatic and homicidal death of the deceased proved and that the evidence of the two eye-witnesses credible — High Court sentenced the appellant to RI for 5 years, while A-1 and A-2 to imprisonment till rising of the Court with fine Rs. 1,000/- — held that the existence of blood or absence thereof would not completely wipe out the evidence of two eye-witnesses — once the evidence of the two eye-witnesses accepted, much importance could not be given to minor discrepancies — no variance in the version of the two eye-witnesses that it was the present appellant, who gave the spear blow on the back of the deceased — held no interference to the well-reasoned judgement of the High Court — appeal dismissed.



 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register