WAHID MIRZA 19 July 2019
WAHID MIRZA 20 July 2019
WAHID MIRZA 20 July 2019
Mastan 31 July 2019
The RTI reply from a government office attested with official stamp and signature of the sender is absolutely can be considiered as evidence. Here i disagree with omprakashji as he said RTI reply is not considered as a evidence. And moreover what it seems from the query is
Police filed chargesheet with some documents which are forged or manipulated
And accused got the documents officially from the original source(govt offices) which are different from the one filed with chargesheet
Mastan 31 July 2019
Mastan 31 July 2019
Mastan 01 August 2019
Omprakash sir, I'm a law student and currently assisting a senior lawyer. the inquirer Wahid Mirza given a vague descripttion of his problem. What i little understood is "some documents produced in a chargesheet" and his father obtained same documents from original source (govt offices) and found that they are forged. And now on that basis he wants to file perjury (Sec 340) petition. Now I agree that during the trail when the witness given statement about those document authenticity in chief and cross examination. Then based on that one can move perjury(340) petition by taking Certified copy of the exhibit doucementary evidence. And with that petition he can attach RTI reply as evidence. And if respondent objects then the concerned officer who given RTI reply has to deposed before court about its authenticity. Its a later process in trail but once can simply produce the copy of RTI reply as annexure to sec 340 petition undoubtedly.