Vijay Kumar (Advocate) 04 May 2008
Ajay kumar singh (Advocate) 05 May 2008
Emily Ngursangzuali Sailo (Legal Officer) 07 May 2008
J K Agrawal (Advocates) 10 May 2008
Vijay Kumar (Advocate) 10 May 2008
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE ) 11 May 2008
Guest (n/a) 11 May 2008
Vijay Kumar (Advocate) 12 May 2008
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE ) 13 May 2008
Bhaskaran Advocate (Lawyer) 14 June 2008
Once the complainant agrees that he is a moneylender then it is imperative for him to produce the licence.
Under all probability he is having a licence lest he would not have accepted the same.
If he never produces the same then you have a good case, there are citations regarding this, present that, while doing the argument.
Vijay Kumar (Advocate) 08 July 2008
Sir, I have come across a case law directly applicable to the present proposition. It is Krishnam Raju Finanaces v. Abida Sultana & others; Criminal Appeal No.333 of 1998 decided on 16-3-2004 by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court. Citation is : 2004(3) RCR (Criminal) 284.
Regards
Vijay Kumar LL.M. Advocate
Muktsar (Punjab)
Vijay Kumar (Advocate) 10 October 2008
Above citation has worked , the accused has been acquitted