Dear Mr. Ram Samudre,
I agree that not everybody has to agree with every idea and everybody has a "choice" as mentioned by you. You might also have faced same thing when people of DRF meet. There are discussions, disagreements and then a common agreement. Unless people are open to discuss in a reasonable manner, what is the use of discussion just for discussion and not for exchange of ideas?
All I am saying is please think before you speak. A greatness of any Constitution is not measured by how big it is. Greatness of Constitution is not measured by how complicated it is. Greatness of Constitution is not measured by how many people it represents.
Greatness of Constitution is measured by how simple it is for common man to understand. Greatness of Constitution is measured by how well it is performing. Greatness of Constitution is measured by how little it has been amended. More Amendments to Constitution show its weakness.
Just because DRF is supporting Constitution or Dr. Ambedkar does not mean it will loose sight of facts, truth and start talking non facts and concocted imaginary ideas. DRF can support the Constitution even by accepting facts about the Constitution. It is not necessary to twist the facts.
All I am saying is that DRF should be reasonable and truthfull in what it is saying. DRF should be amenable to reasoning if it wants support from people. Otherwise it can continue the way it wants, people will not support anything unreasonable. THIS IS a FACT that DRF will have to face and accept very soon.
Hope DRF and all people of India reading this find me reasonable in what I am saying. If I am saying anything unreasonable please let me know, I will correct myself.
