States are not named after language?
Tamil nadu, Gujrath, rajasthan, Bihar, West Bengal, Orissa, Assam, Manipur .
Anil Agrawal (Retired) 26 December 2009
Let Telugu State be created, I shall be the first person to ask Raj Thackerey to clamour for changing the name of Maharashtra to Marathi State.
Anil Agrawal (Retired) 26 December 2009
On 1 November 1956, the states of India were reorganized on linguistic grounds. The territories of the State of Hyderabad were divided between newly created Andhra Pradesh, Mumbai state (later Maharashtra), and Karnataka. Telugu speaking area of Hyderabad state also known as Telangana (including Hyderabad city) was merged with Telugu speaking state of Andhra state to create to Andhra Pradesh. Thus, Hyderabad became the capital city of the new state of Andhra Pradesh.
PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR) 26 December 2009
ANIL JI,
THANKS FOR YOUR COLLECTION OF DATA FROM WIKIPEDEA HISTORY PAGES, WHICH ARE MORE AUTHENTICATIVE THAN ANY OTHER BOOKS. , HATS UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108) 13 February 2010
LANGUAGE PROBLEM :
Journalist : ND Tiwari'ji, as the Hon'ble Governer of AP, how could you indulge in such an act?
Tiwari : I'm extremely sorry, mistook TELANGANA agitation for "TEL-LAGANA" !
heeee......heeee....heee...heee..hee....hee
Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
Ravi Shankar (prof) 24 October 2013
Article 4 of the constitution says state reorganization can not be construed as constitutional amendment. Article 371d.10 says, irrespective of any other section/article in the constitution, 371d stays in effect. these two are mutually contradictory. Can any learned lawyers enlighten us regarding this issue? I mean, which provision supersedes which? Can a law with simple majority in the house set aside a constitutional amendment?