kindly explain
AMITS
(Querist) 03 November 2015
This query is : Resolved
The recent judgement by Justice Anil R. Dave and Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel over hindu sucession act,2005 is sounding confusing kindly put in your valuable thoughts to make it clear, does that means that all those daughters who are fighting for there claim and have filed the suit before 2005 and whose parents were not alive at the time of filing of suit are not entitled for their share any more. does that mean all those lakhs of sisters will be devoid of their share if they have claimed their share after thei parents death,this succession act was passed by parliament,can supreme court clarify what parliament has made or is it for the parliamentary committee to put in their valuble inputs rather then supreme court,what will be the effect of this clarification by supreme court over the various cases pending in different high courts. kindly throw some light over the issue.
R.K Nanda 
(Expert) 03 November 2015
read said judgement.
Hemant Agarwal
(Expert) 05 November 2015
1. Law has no place for "sentiments & emotions", as made out by the queriest (AMITS).
2. Hindu Succession Act, in itself already had provisions that Daughters would have thier interests secured
"FROM" date of amendment, i.e. 2005. Various existing judgements contradicted the provisions of the Act.
SC being the supreme authority has put to rest all such contradictory judgements and all existing claims
filed in contravention of the said Act, now shall be termed as legally infructous.
3. IT is very very simple, clear & good reasoned Judgement by the SC. However the parliament can make relevant amendments in the Act or even issue an ordinance, which would have effect of "setting aside the said Judgement".
Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
Read Articles: http://hemantagarwal21.blogspot.in/?view=sidebar
K.S.Srinivas
(Expert) 10 November 2015
Agreed with Sri Hemant Agarwal.
