Can in Indian films we can use the dialogues on the word "Olympics" or we need to take the permissions from IOC (International Olympic Council) for the same or there may be copyright or trademark issues
can someone use the word "Olympic" as a dialogue in its film in India?
property belongs to grandma who had two daughters one of them passed away the property has to be divided between the alive daughter and the children of expired daughter.one of the sons of demised daughter an advocate is strongly and deliberately objecting to the partition whereas all the other four members remain united .we belong to hindu family .Is there any provision to register the partition deed skipping his consent?will that be valid?
experts
Home
Formation of co op housing society and redevelopment of a chawl
by
Krishna Ramu Naidu
Dear All, thank you for your continuous support to people like me with your prompt advices and comments. i stay in a chawl in eastern suburb in mumbai, we are all 40 members who are occupying a structure(ground + 1) with minimum area of 300sq ft( considering Both ground + 1)and we have a agreement with the landlord saying that landlord has given a piece of land ad-measuring X*Y on lease for 99 years and charges a rent of small amount. my queries are 1> we all members want to form Co op housing society but landlord is not giving consent. is their any way that we can form a co op housing society 2> what all are our rights in this situation 3> we all members want to redevelop this property but landlord is not cooperative as he is builder himself. and on our proposal of redevelopment he is demanding construction cost of 1/4th of area which we possess now.then only he will redevelop. and nothng else t society like no corpus fund n all. please guide us through this. 4> how can we take the conveyance from him so that we can redevelop this property thanks and regards Krishna
Respected all
I am working in marketing department of a small dyeing factory where no medical insurance like thing is there. Also i am only child of my parents and no brother & sis and all responsibility on me. Due to my uncertain job and my financial condition Last year in June 2015 I have purchased a medical policy for my mother and father where premium taken for 1 year is Rs 23000 ...sum insured amount is 3lakh for normal + additional 3lakh for critical illness which means total 6lakhs.before issuing the policy iffco tokio had conducted the health checkup of my father and all reports are ok then only they have issued Policy.
Recently on 15 Feb 2016 after vomiting and difficulty in swallowing I have bring my father into hospital and next day in endoscopy of stomach it is found that it is esophagus cancer for re confirmation they have sent the sample for biopsy and after biopsy report cancer confirmation recvd. But as per iffco tokio they have declined the medical cashless and told us that in this disease they cannot give cashless also this disease is not covered in policy 1st year but no such info given by agent neither in their policy copy.. I am badly need money to treat my papa .. I don't have appropriate money inspite of taking the policy.. Plz help me
Satyam
Dear Sir.
After my mutual consent divorced in April 2010 ,my daughters custody is with me. Since that my ex is not paying maintenance amt. rs.2000 monthly to daughter which should gradually increase as per her education expenses.
I have remarried and my husband is taking all the responsibility of my daughter. I have changed her name on my current husbands name by doing gazzet.
My ex don't have any property on his own but through his parents.
His parents are no more now and they have not given anything to my daughter. They have property from their parents.( pushthani). . Which now will go to my ex and his sister. Just wanted to know if my daughter will have a right on my ex's property share. As he is remarried again but do not have any issue yet.
Thanks and regards,
Dear Sir.
After my mutual consent divorced in April 2010 ,my daughters custody is with me. Since that my ex is not paying maintenance amt. rs.2000 monthly to daughter which should gradually increase as per her education expenses.
I have remarried and my husband is taking all the responsibility of my daughter. I have changed her name on my current husbands name by doing gazzet.
My ex don't have any property on his own but through his parents.
His parents are no more now and they have not given anything to my daughter. They have property from their parents.( pushthani). . Which now will go to my ex and his sister. Just wanted to know if my daughter will have a right on my ex's property share. As he is remarried again but do not have any issue yet.
Thanks and regards,
Rahul Publishers Inc. v Modi Jadeja
Rahul Publishers Inc. is a world renowned publisher of expensive educational textbooks, which are purchased by some of the best universities all over the world. Rahul Publishers Inc. also gives books to distributors in India, at a much cheaper price than its American Counterpart. The quality in the books is the same, except for very few spelling changes and illustrations. In other words, the Indian books can be used by American students for educational purposes without compromising on the quality of education.
Modi Jadeja, an Indian citizen, seizing this opportunity, legally purchases these books in India and exports these books to the United States of America. He then sells them at a cheaper price in America, while still making a reasonable profit. Rahul Publishers Inc comes to know of the same through their agent in America, after their sales dip by 3%. However, Rahul Publishers Inc unable to take action against Modi Jadeja in America, following the United States Supreme Court Judgment in a case known as Kirtsaeng v John Wiley and Sons Inc., files a suit for temporary injunction and infringement of copyright against Modi Jadeja in the Madras High Court. Rahul Publishers Inc also claims more than 10 lakh rupees worth of damages from Modi Jadeja, for loss of sales caused by copyright violation.
Modi Jadeja raises the defense of the First-sale doctrine and states that the doctrine is implicitly recognized by Section 14 of the copyright Act, and that due to political considerations, the same was left out of the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010. The First-sale doctrine basically says once a copyright owner makes a sale, he loses his exclusive right to lease, re-sell, or lend. The new copyright owner cannot however reproduce the same. Further, Modi Jadeja states that due to the latest decision of the US Supreme Court, which has been relied upon by the courts in India on previous occasions, Indian courts need to take a closer look at the First-sale doctrine and set right the previously much criticized decisions on the issue.
The Madras High Court grants temporary injunction, and nominal damages of Rs. 50,000 stating that the First-sale doctrine can only be implemented if the same has been expressly mentioned in the Copyright Act, or in previous decisions of the Indian Courts, and that relying on a latest US judgment would be averse to public policy.
Modi Jadeja has appealed the decision to the Indian Supreme Court.
I am on behalf of Rahul Publishers.WHAT POSSIBLE ARGUEMENTS CAN I MAKE IN THIS CASE? please help
IN WHAT CLASS OR CLASSES OF GOODS OR SERVICES DOES A WEBSITE FOR ONLINE SHOPPING FALL?
my share in father's property
My father holds 3.25 agricultural land and one plot in city. We are two brothers and one sister. All are unmarried. My father has kept all property with himself. Agricultural land is ancestral and plot is self made. He is not giving me share and harassing me. How can I take my share from him by filling case. Land is another city and living in another. In which court shall I apply