Information: As per initial survey revenue record(1958),survey no:353/1 is of 4 acres owned by 3 members . survey no: 353/2 is of 8 Acres owned by 6 members (1.Mr.Ram, 2. Mr.B, 3.Mr.Dasaradh, 4.Mr.D, 5.Mr.E, 6.Mr.F) but each person share is not mentioned in that record. then, Re-survey done in 1967. In between 1958 to 1967 there is no survey record. As per Re-survey record(1967),survey no:353/1 is sub divided into 4 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/1,353/2,353/3,353/4) survey no:353/2 is sub divided into 8 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/5,353/6,353/7,353/8,353/9,353/10,353/11,353/12). it is clearly mentioned that S.No 353/10 is owned by Mr.Putra son of Mr. Lakshman in re-survey revenue record(1967). Case: Mr.Dasaradh has two sons Mr.Ram and Mr.Lakshman. Mr.Ram has 3 sons, namely Mr.ramesh, Mr.suresh, Mr. Naresh. Mr.Lakshman has 1 son ,namely Mr.Putra. In 1974, Mr.Ravana bought 1 acre of land from Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram. in that sale deed it is mentioned that out of 8 acres in s.no 353/2, 1 acre of land sold by Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram to Mr.Ravana. there is no specific detail about the 1 acre survey number in that sale deed. S.no: 353/10 is mutated into the name of Mr.Putra's wife and it is in the enjoyment of her. due to old age of Mr.putra's wife , she left the village and staying with her children in city. by taking this advantage Mr.Ravana son is trying to occupy the land of Mr.Putra's wife by showing the sale deed mentioned above. now, Mr.putra's wife went to the court , and got the interim injuction order against Mr.Ravana's son. Mr.Ravana's son submitted sale deed in the court and claiming S.No 353/10 because of no clarity about 1 acre land survey number purchased by Mr.Ravana.
For 353/2 There are 6 members. In that 6 Members Mr. RAM and Mr. Dasaradh are Elder son and father. Other 4 Members are different persons. After re-survey 353/2 sub divided as 353/5 to 353/12. In 353/5 to 353/12 Elder son Share is Not mentioned. But Elder son Mr. Ram's Elder son Mr. Ramesh sold 1 acre to Mr. Ravana. Whereas younger son Mr. Lakshman's son Mr. Putra Share is mentioned as 353/10 In re-survey Record.
Will Ravana's son get succeded in this case?
Hello Experts,
I have seen my property regsitration papers yesterday. In Payment Challan MTR 6 which i have seen the details of property including my buyer Name its me and seen there is validity of CHallan like 28/08/2015 and valid till 31/03/2099. ?
I wants to know that meaning?
and what will after 2099? is proprty ownership still mine or it would be changed.?
Your Co-operation in this matter highly appreciable.
Thanks in advance.
Kamlesh Shah
+91 97692 52358
Sir our land is 143 and we have the document for it but we are getting notice that the signature of officers are not in correct sequence date. Ur 143 is not correct. What is our fault. It is the officer mistake. Is it our crime
Our property is 143 but officer make mistakes in signature
1.One private finance company has put my name in place of guarantor and sending me notice to repay the car loan taken by some un known person.
2. When I came to know, I reply to the advocate of company that I never give any gurantee to the said person.
3. Meanwhile I received a notice from finance company about appointment of an arbitrator I replied that I am not a party as I never give any document or my concern for any loan or guarantee. but just after 5 to 7 days I received a letter from arbitrator that he put hearing of above case at *th feb and ask to appear me in personal or trough counsellor. If I not appear before him he will pass an ex party order.
My questions are
1. Should I appear before arbitrator even I am not a party as I never give any gurantee of above said loan?
2. If arbitrator pass any order against me than how and where can I challenge his order?
3. Can I deny to appear before him?
4. What action can I take against finance company and borrower also?
5. How can I take stay against arbitration procedure?
6. any other remmedy?
7. What I have to do now?
I put my second hand car on sale.The buyer saw and remitted Rs 5000 as token to my bank account. Post that I decided not sell the car due emotional reasons and communicated the same to the buyer. Now the buyer is saying that he wants more money. Details: Money received from buyer on 20th Jan 2018. Post the transfer the buyer send message that he would meet on Monday at 11:00 am. On Sunday I conveyed my decision not to sell and asked him share his account details to return the money. On Monday he does not turn up at 11:00, however gives me a call in the evening to meet, which I could not as I was working. Post that he has been threatening to bring about 4-5 people to my residence and create a ruckus. What do I do?
Hi, I am NRI. Please let me know about two things :
1. How much Indian currency can I carry while arriving in India from abroad.
2. Can I get paid for my freelance work which do outside India in Indian rupees.
Thanks in advance!
Regarding Compassionate grounds of appointment a petitioner filed her WP in HC, and prayed ...
“to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 and 2 in trying to appoint the 3rd respondent (Concubine’s son) for the post as a xxxxxx in the place of petitioner’s father without considering her (the petitioner) for compassionate appointment as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and being violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to issue any proceedings by appointing the respondent No.3 under compassionate grounds in the place of petitioners father and pass .... ”.
But still it is pending in the Hon’ble court since a decade. Recently the 3rd respondent expired.
For appropriate immediate relief what sort of procedure the petitioner (she) should follow... pls. guide in this issue.
Sir, we faced nagitive result in the sub court reg mesne profits case. shall we file revision pition in the same court
Stay order
Respected Sir/Madam
In Sub Court after Judgment, Defendant file IA ( Set side petition)under limitation act 5, that petition dismissed, because they do not show sufficient cause, and day by day delay reasons.He moves to High court for filling CRP for stay order and for order of ( Sub court) dismissed purpose.what happen