AKRAMULLAH KHAN
20 September 2014 at 12:38
NO CONFIDENCE MOTION MOVED UNDER COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1964 AGAINST THE CHAIRMAN, THERE ARE 13 DIRECTORS ELECTED FOR THE SOCIETY OF PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY. AND OUT OF 13 MEMBERS 10 MEMBERS OF HAVE FILED NO CONFIDENCE MOTION AGAINST THE CHAIRMAN BUT THE NOTICE WAS SERVED WITH HAVING NO CLEAR 15 DAYS GAP FROM THE DATE OF SERVING TO THE DATE OF NO CONFIDENCE MOTION AND WAS JUST 13 DAYS.
THE CHAIRMAN MOVE TO THE HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD AND THE INTERIM STAY WAS GRANTED TO HIM AND NOTICES WERE LEFT PENDING SINCE LAST MONTH. AND WAS NOT SERVED TO ANY OF 10 MEMBERS.
HENCE I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHETHER WE CAN MOVE ANOTHER NO CONFIDENCE MOTION DURING PENDENCY OF CASE AT HIGH COURT HYDERABAD.
PLEASE FURNISH YOUR ESTEEMED SUGGESTIONS FOR MOVING FURTHER WITH THE NO CONFIDENCE MOTION.
I AM ATTACHING THE ORDER COPY OF HIGH COURT AP BEARING WP NO. 22585/2014 FOR PRESIZE SUGGESTIONS WITH REGARD TO MY QUESTION I HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED
TO THIS FORUM.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST,
TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WPMP.NO: 28320 of 2014
IN
WP.NO: 22585 of 2014
Between:
B.Chandra Shekar S/o Venkatesham
President, Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society,
Tandur R/o Thangallapalty village, Tandur Mandal, Adilabad Dist.
...Petitioner
(Petitioner in WP 22585 of 2014
on the file of High Court)
AND
1 The Government of AP., rep. by its Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Mancherial, Adilabad District.
2 The Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Society Tandur, Rep. by its Secretary, Tandur Mandal, Adilabad Dist.
3 Sri. Suram Damodar S/o Narsaiah, Director, PACS Tandur, R/o H.No. 5-32
Post & Village : Madaram, Mandal Tandur, Adilabad.
4 Sri. Gattu Muralidhar Rao S/o. Vissaiah, Director, PACS Tandur, R/o H. No : 2-63, Bramhan Wada Achalapur (Mandal ), Tandur, Aditabad District.
5 Sri. Gudindla Janardhan, S/o. Bheemaiah, Director, PACS Tandur, Walmiki Nagar Post & Village, Tandur, Adilabad Dist.
6 Sri. Gandla Sathaiah S/o. Venkati, Director, PACS Tandur R/o H. No 5-92
Kurma Wada Post & Village, Rechini, Adilabad Dist.
7 Sri. Keshetti Santhosh Kumar, S/o. Gajanan, Director, PACS Tandur, H.No : 3-54, Main Road, Rechini (Post) Mandal : Tandur, Adilabad.
8 Sri V.Narayana S/o Bheemaiah, Director, PACS Tandur H. No : 1-56/1 S.C. Colony, Achalapur (Post) Mandal : Tandur, Adilabad, Adilabad Dist.
9 Sri. Masadi Poshakka W/o. Ramaiah, Director PACS Tandur H. No : 2-192/1, Boyapalli Village, Mandal : Tandur, Adilabad Dist.
10 Sri. Gangadari Bheemaiah S/o. Balaraju, H. No : 1-14, Kapu wada Village : Choutapalli, Mandal : Tandur, Adilabad.
11 Sri. Durgam Laxmi W/o. Chandraiah, Director PACS Tandur Madaram - 3 Post : Madaram Town Ship, Mandal : Tandur, Adilabad District.
12 Sri. Rukum Narsaiah S/o. Mallaiah, Director PACS Tandur H. No : 2-62 Village Kasipeta, Mandal : Tandur, Adilabad District.
13 Kadem Parwathi Bai W/o Sone Rao, Director PACS Tandur H. No : 1-27 Village Narsapur, Mandal : Tandur, Adilabad District.
14 Sri. Mohammed Esa S/o Mohammed Ayub, Director PACS Tandur, H.No. 5-19/2, Choti Masjid Post & Village, Tandur, Adilabad District.
(R2 – R14 are not necessary parties)
...Respondents
(Respondents in-do-)
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP for Cooperation
Petition under Section 151 of C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in the W.P., the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the Notice vide RC No.830/2014-B1 dated 19.07.2014 (served on 29.07.2104) issued by the respondent No.1, pending disposal of WP No.22585 of 2014 on the file of the High Court.
The Court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order. (The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case)
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for 1st respondent.
Although time was granted to learned Government Pleader for 1st respondent for instructions as to whether the impugned notice of No-Confidence dt.19-07-2014 was actually served on the petitioner on 29-07-2014, the learned Government Pleader has not been able to obtain any instructions.
In this view of the matter, since there is no gap of 15 days between the alleged date of service of said notice on petitioner and the holding of meeting on 11-08-2014, there shall be interim direction as prayed for.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1 The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Mancherial, Adilabad District.
(BY RPAD)
2 One CC to Sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
3 Two CCs to the G.P. for Co-operation (Telangana), High Court, Hyderabad. (OUT)
4 One Spare Copy.
nnr
HIGH COURT
MSR,J
DATE: 08-08-2014
ORDER
W.P.M.P.NO. 28320 OF 2014
IN
W.P.NO. 22585 OF 2014
INTERIM DIRECTION
HIGH COURT
Nnr
Date of Drafting : 08-08-2014
MSR,J
DATE: 08-08-2014
ORDER
W.P.M.P.NO. 28320 OF 2014
IN
W.P.NO. 22585 OF 2014
INTERIM DIRECTION
arthur varghese
01 September 2014 at 22:32
Dear Sir
I was working as an Operations manager in a courier company dealing in online shipments delivery from Dec 2012 to Apr 2014.
The packets were delivered by persons who collected the amounts and brought back the money to office, handing the same over to the accountant.
Now the company is not functioning due to financial issues.
Every day the accounts person used to deposit the cash in the bank and send report. The person in charge of centrally coordinating the collections used to record the total amount received.
Though I had resigned by Apr end as salaries was not being paid for some months, now they are sending a report stating that many shipments were received & cash collected but has not been accounted or deposited. They have also sent nefarious persons to my house on the pretext that reconciliation has to be done. On enquiry these persons are official goondas used by private banks to collect from defaulters on loan payments.
Kindly advise what is the remedy available for me in such cases as I have not handled cash but still held responsible. Also when the company has resorted to use arm -twisting tactics to intimidate and collect money where none is due.
Vinay
26 August 2014 at 14:06
I have applied for Compassionate Job available in Karnataka Government due to the death of my father who was in service. There are not Internal Exams nor quick Promotions in the department. I want to change to Other Department suitable. Please suggest..
Sharad
18 August 2014 at 13:50
I have live recorded music which is not publish by the author or any CD publishing house.
The singers are dead around 20 years back.
Can I post this on public domain? or distribute free?
Easwaran Chadalavada
13 August 2014 at 23:45
Dear Sir/Madam,
Two Groups fought Resident Welfare Election.
One group just named themselves as LOTUS GROUP. The
without any symbol, does it mean it is affiliated to any party?
The other faction which fought the election successfully by using a replica of the BALLOT PAPER be circulated with selected candidates ticked to gain more votes.
My question:
01. Using LOTUS GROUP means affiliation to any POLITICAL PARTY???
02. Can a REPLICA OF BALLOT PAPER be circulated by a group ticking in column against their name??? Does it not amount to violation of rules.
Hope this is not a vague query or unfit query.
Thanks/Regards
Easwaran
Gaurav Deep Goel
13 August 2014 at 21:45
What/ Can action can be taken against a official under the writ of quo warranto for illegally arresting a person? Kindly provide judgements if possible
pratik
12 August 2014 at 15:15
Repealing & Amending Bill 2014.
In this bill they have mention
Eg: The Indian Majority (Amendment) Act, 1999 (The whole)
Question: So Amendment which were done in 1999 in Indian Majority,1875 are Repeal or the whole act is repeal.
Jaigopal Soni
12 August 2014 at 12:41
I have recently filed an writ petition under service matter category through my counsel drafted myself. In which high court has not given opinion/decision on the relief points but given relief which is not asked in petition. Please suggest me if I can prefer an appeal against order or I may file another writ under civil matter to get opinion on merit. Case No WPS/1819/2014 decided on 05/08/2014 at High Court of Bilaspur.
Deep Banarjee
11 August 2014 at 15:55
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am from Kolkata, my sister socially got married on the year of 2003 but she didn’t transfer her RATION CARD to her husband address from her native place. She not even is using her husband surname. Later on she started residing at her father’s address with her two kids.
Now she wants her two kids ration card to make on her native place(father’s address) address where her Ration card exists.
Instead of showing her kids birth certificates where my sister husband’s name - the baby’s name clearly mentioned the rationing officer refusing her to do that showing the bellow mentioned reasons:
A) There is no ration card on this address of the kids father’s-my sister’s husband.
B) My sister is not residing her husband address
C) She is not using her husband surname
D) She unable to show marriage certificate
Now, please advice the procedure by following that she can make the ration card of her kids.
Also please advice, is there any rule that the baby cant get their identity on her mother name?
Thanking you….
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Compensation for loss for land
i have a client whose forefather had lost his land to goverment about 60 years ago. No compensation has yet been paid for the same. Can i get compensation by filing an WPC in HC? Is there any limitation to agitate that isssue? pls enlighten me