harithashobha
28 January 2010 at 16:20
whether the governer has the power to suspend a chief minister???
harithashobha
28 January 2010 at 16:19
whether the governer has the power to suspend a chief minister???
jitendra
27 January 2010 at 20:23
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. Vidhyasthan is a state in the Indian union with a population of 4,56,78909 and literacy is 95%.
2 .There are 16000 schools,2800 colleges and 12 universities in the state.
3. Since early 1970’S student politics is very active in the state.
4. Formal college union office bearers constitute majority of the members of the state legislative
assembly.
5. Till 2006 presidential system of election was followed in the college union election of the state.
6. In the year 2007 new college union election rules where implemented and through these rules
following restrictions where imposed, in accordance in direction of supreme court on 22-09-2006
in university of Kerala .v. council of principals Kerala.
(i) Rs.5000 limit on election expenses per candidate
(ii) No printed posters, printed pamphlets or any other for the purpose of canvassing will be allowed.
(iii) Election to be held on a yearly basis and the same should be held between six and eight weeks
from the date of commencement of the academic session.
(iv) With a view to prevent the inflow of funds from the political party into the students election, the
candidates are specially bared from utilizing funds from any other source then voluntary
contribution from the student body.
(v) No academic areas for the candidates in the year of contesting elections.
(vi) 75 percent attendance record or the minimum prescribed by university, which ever is higher.
(vii) Upper age limit of the candidate is fixed at 28 years for research students.
7.Nandan Lal is the LL.M. student of Government Law College Jhanpur located in the
capital city.
8. He was the first rank holder in the Final LL.B Examination of University of Jhanpur held
in 2008.
9. He was the president of the University Student’s Union during 2007-2008.
10. He joined for LL.M. Degree Course in July 2009.
11. On August 2009 he met with a motor accident and was hospitalized for 2 months.
12. On November 17 ,2009 the election to the College Union of Government Law College
Jhanpur was notified.
13. Though Nandan Lal filed nomination to the post Chairman, College Union, his
nomination was rejected on 23-11-2009 pointing out that the 75% attendance is not
fulfilled by him.
14. On 25-11-2009 Nandan Lal filed a writ petition before the high court of Vidhyasthan
challenging the decision of the Supreme Court in University of Kerala v Council of
Principals Kerala and College Union Election Rules 2007.
15. It was contended that the restrictions to contest college union elections and restrictions on
election campaign are violation of his fundamental rights under Art 14,19 and 21 of the
Constitution and the action of the supreme court is usurping of legislative power.
16. The High Court dismissed the petition on 1-12-2009 stating that a decision of the
Supreme Court could not be challenged under Art.226.
17. On 3-12-2009 Nandan Lal filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court challenging
the decision of the Supreme Court in University of Kerala v Council of Principals Kerala
and College Union Election Rules 2007.
18. It was contended that the restrictions to contest college union elections and restrictions on
election campaign are violation of his fundamental rights under Art 14,19 and 21 of the
Constitution and the action of the supreme court is usurping of legislative power.
19.On behalf of the State of Vidhyasthan all the contentions are refuted and submitted that the
petition may be dismissed applying the principle of resjudicata.
20. The case is posted for final hearing on 29th January 2010.
ISSUES INVOLVED
1. Whether the hon’ble court has the jurisdiction to entertain the said matter.
2. Whether the restriction to contest college union elections and restriction
on election campaign are violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under
Article 14 , 19 & 21 of the constitution of India 1950.
3. Whether the action of the supreme court was uprising of legislative power.
Chinju Rani
27 January 2010 at 08:46
I want to know the procedure for changing my official signature from my current one.
RBSAIADITHIYA
26 January 2010 at 16:28
Sir , I would like to change my name only for professional purpose,
and I have submitted my application for name change with the govt.
I possess a passport , is there any need for me to change my name also in the passport or I can continue to have my old name in the passport
for your guidance pls
Regards
R Sudhakar
Anonymous
26 January 2010 at 13:23
I am born & brought up in maharashtra. I have three daughters & no son. my first daughter married in gujrat, second and third in maharashtra. after marriage of all daughters can i continue huf ? with only wife as member ? or what will be position of huf and who will be coparcenor? if i continue huf what will happen after my death. i have good amount of investments in shares/govt.securities etc. pl. guide
Anonymous
25 January 2010 at 22:22
Well users, SC Community, dispossessed by the mighty of the village and even all authorities do not take action against the culprits and hence the rights of the downtrodden villagemen were subjected to such an extent that which could not be mentioned or presented in this page and also police fabricated a false story in collusion and conspiracy with the defaulters. How to bring the deprived one to their original status and how the well to be restored to them for their use.
shantanu dekhane
25 January 2010 at 17:53
What is the scope of judicial activisim in our Federal structure of the Indian constitution and What is the exact border Line for judjes?
Ria
20 January 2010 at 17:21
Respected Sir,
Please guide as to the procedure for filing PIL in Maharashtra.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Fundamental Duties
(i) Why chapter IV-A, Article 51-A was inserted in the Constitution of India and what was the intention behind the amendment?
(ii) Whether any mechanism has been provided for enforcement of the provision or for monitoring its enforcement?
(iii) What efforts have been made (either by the Govt. or by any other entity) to ensure compliance of the provision?
(iii) Whether the provision has remained on the books only?