what is the differnce between the constitutional law and administrative law.
Dear Sirs,
My father died on Jan 1996 . My mother died on 1992. I my father ,my wife,and my childrens were living in our house which one is self earned of my father. I got 2 elder sister and two younger sister who are well settled. They all got married before 1986. my father suddenly fell sick and got admitted in a Hospital .So I asked them to stay with me for a help till my father gets fine. My father wanted to write will with the help of our family friends which was well known to all my sisters . So He wrote in the hospital a Will stating that the Money deposited in various banks and deposits will go to mysisters and the only Dwelling House we were living in favour of the only son thats me. My stated that he had illegal affair with a lady when mother was there and taht lady passed awy before my mother. she had three Childrens and for them also my father did all sorts of needfull.The will was unregisttered one.
Before I finish my fathers last rigths Suddenly my sisters and there Husbands started blackmailing me and sent a lawyer Notice stating that I hav deprieved them by fabricating a forged will and went for a partition Suit .
I consulted my lawyer and filed the will for Probate and it was Converted into TOS.
From side my fathers frnd and others including me deposed in court that the will was written by father .
Sudenly the y brougth a petition that my fathers concubine son was also is need of a Partition who never appeared in Court. and it was also noted by counsel in court records.
The Trial was wantedly draged by them up to 2001.
The Single Judge one fine day he resrved the Judgement with out mentioning the date. After a year When Honarable Judge one week before his retierment Prnounced Judgement. Stating that The will has minor discrepcencies so I am allowing the partion of 1/8th shares. I went for a Apeal for the bench.
In the Bench the Trail started and it Prolonged up to 2006.
The honarable bench Judge reserved the Judgement ,After 8months one month before his retirement he pronounced the judgement stating that the Single Judge mistakenly taken that the Concubine son was a secon wife of my father there could not be given any share. He didnt consider the Will or the Deposition given by the witness and even Sec 23 of Hindu Succession Act{special provision for a Dwelling House} came in to force on 2004 Amendment that is Ommision of sec 23 is applicable even for pending Cases so there is 1/5 of Partion is applicable.by 2007
Again I went for SLP in Supreme Court on 2007. After two years i:e on 2009 before the retierment of the Judge the same Judgement given by lower Court was repeated with out going thru my Pleadings.Stating that they got equal rights 1/5 share as per 2005 law even though the Suit was filed on 1996 Pending case is also applicable and they can go for new partion Suit. Totally they did not go whts there in the will.
Mean time Now my sisters Approched the HC and Order on previous case which was filed on 2007 to appoint a Advocate commisioner to part the House in metes and Bounds.
Please any one guide me wht further Step to be taken by me to Prove the will and safe gaurd my only House.
Whts Retrospective act pl explain me If U ppl can.
If ther is any Judgements or law related to my matter pl send the same ASAP.
The will was Prepared by our fmly friend one Advocate Notary Public
and she was also been examined.
Please Save me and my family
Respected Learned friends,
One of my friend, (Sri Lankan citizen) was arrested out of suspicion in the airport by the Q Branch Police for carrying gold. Later, he was acquitted and given clean chit also the seized gold and his passport were returned. He applied for the exit Visa at the Chennai FRO office in Shastri Bhawan on October. Even after lapse of three months, he received no reply from the Officials. In his repeated enquiries, he was informed that the file has been forwarded to Delhi Office and they haven’t received any further communication in this regard. He was compelled to go Delhi in order to move the file from the Table. Can he exercise the RTI to know the status of his exit visa?
Your kind opinion is much appreciated
sir,
i want to know in any section of law by which these private college(Engineering,nursing,Be.D)etc. which are made by big builders and those who are just making money in reallity they are not imparting any education there.
How can we stop them.
What are my legal right so that i can stop them.
There are around 50 engineering colleges in my city are they really needed..
it is not the matter that these college are in quantity but what matters is quality of education they are imparting.
What they are doing is in the post of like lecturers which must have a qualification of degree as well as Experinced they are posting freshers so how can a student learn form them..
Is it not a cheat on them.
So i want to know by which article of constitution i can stop them and what legal documents i have to require while during the case.....if I
If I want to challenge the vires of a service rule contained in the IAS(Pay)Rules,1954,can I file an application before the CAT or will I be required to move a writ petition before the High Court? What is the position after verdict of the Apex Court in L.Chandrakumar's case?
whether fundamental rights can be amdended by using power given in art 368 of the constitution.
whether the action of supreme court in university of kerala v. council of principals amounts to usurption of legislative power?
whether the implementation of lyngdoh committee report by a judicial order amounts to usurption of legilative power by supreme court of india?
Our country is a republic and president is the chief.our constitution provide enormous power to president,if we read between the lines.Then why PM runs the govt?Is there any specific article mentioning the power of PM and its responsibilities to run the country?
Kindly let me know as to what is the time limit for filing a review petition in the Supreme Court?
Uniform civil code
what are the Hindrance facing by Government because of which they are not able to enforce art44 of Constitution with reference to Uniform Civil Code.