Service of copy

I have filed a writ petition (Calcutta High Court).
Please tell me which of the following modes are valid mode of service,
1. Personal service
2. Speed Post
3. Regd. Post
4. Coureer Service
Can any senior provide me the format of Notice which is to be send with the copy of the WRIT PETITION?
And also the format of AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE.

Is our country violating U.N. Human Rights?

Our country is a member of United Nations. U.N. will treat caste discrimination as Human Rights violations. In our country reservations for Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes, Backward classes, Minorities are going on. Is it not comes under caste discrimination?

Is our country violating U.N. Human Rights?

Please clarify.

SALE OF PROPERTY BELONGS TO COMPANY (UNDER LIQUIDATION) BY F

MAX PARTS PVT LTD incorporated on 12-8-1964

As on today Company Status is under Liquidation

Property Location

Revenue Survey No. 421/Paiki, Jamnagar, Hapa
Plot No. 13
T. P. Scheme No. 3/A
Original Plot (O.P.) No. 24
Final Plot (F.P.) No. 57
Near Paglam & Paglam
Opp. Cold Storage, Jamnagar

Area 7160 Sq. Ft.

Purchased by Company on 28th September 1964 from Shri Narendrasingh Madhusingh Kher by a agreement registered on 30th September 1964

On 30-4-1984
One Mr. Girjashanker Jatashanker Bhatt C/o. M/s. Harish Automobiles, Kashi Vishwanath Road, Jamnagar sold the property alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of the Company
to
one Mr. Kantilal K. Kotecha Advocate having address at J-5, 2nd floor, Super Market, Jamnagar and 26 Modern Market, Near Amber Cinema, Jamnagar on behalf of and alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of one Smt. Lilavanti Revashanker Bhatt, having address at Ambika Bhavan, 1 Nagar Para, Jamnagar

On 19-8-1993
Mr. Kantilal K. Kotecha Advocate having address at J-5, 2nd floor, Super Market, Jamnagar and 26 Modern Market, Near Amber Cinema, Jamnagar on behalf of and alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of one Smt. Lilavanti Revashanker Bhatt, having address at Ambika Bhavan, 1 Nagar Para, Jamnagar sold the property
to
1) Smt. Jaishreeben Arvindkumar Machchhar having address at Bhanushalee Wad, Sheri No. 4, Jamnagar
2) Smt. Jyotiben Prakashkumar Lakhani having address at Nagar Para near Pili Bangli, Jamnagar

On 20-3-1998
Smt. Jaishreeben Arvindkumar Machchhar having address at Bhanushalee Wad, Sheri No. 4, Jamnagar released the property
To
Smt. Jyotiben Prakashkumar Lakhani having address at Nagar Para near Pili Bangli, Jamnagar
As per record with Jamnagar Area Development Authority as on 17-4-2006 the property is in the name of Company

The Company was initially formed by one Shri Jamnadas G. Jivrajani at Bombay

The previous directors retired in or about May 1975 and
1. Shyamsunder S. Bubna
2. Jeevanlata S. Bubna
has been joined as directors of the Company.

On 19-7-1983 a notice sent to the Share Holders and also published the said notice in Mah Gov Gazette dated 28-7-1983 and English and Marathi News Paper under Sec 500 of Companies Act as the information for meeting of creditors to be held on 11-8-1983

On 8-9-1983 the notice for information under sec 516 for appointment of Liquidator has been published in Mah Gov Gazette and English and Marathi News Paper

On 7-6-1984 the notice for information under sec 509 notice convening final meeting has been published in Mah Gov Gazette and English and Marathi News Paper

P.S. THE ALLEGED POWER OF ATTORNEY OF MAX PARTSPVT. LTD. FAVOURING MR. GIRJASHANKER JATASHANKER BHATT USED FOR SALE OF PROPERTY ON 30-4-1984 IS LIKELY TO BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED IN BOMBAY AS ALL THE DIRECTORS AS WELL AS LIQUIDATOR AND/OR COMPANY IS ALSO INCORPORATED AT BOMBAY ONLY

One court, final judgment.

In our country for every law there is a remedy. Due to fundamental rights provided in our constitution several culprits are escaping from law or prolonging cases in the court. Due to hierarchy system in judicial from lower court to Supreme Court culprits are taking advantage. One court, final judgment. No appeal should not permit to higher courts except in death sentences.

Please comment.

Why not taken action by HC?

In Andhra Pradesh one District Collector declared one active MLA is not belonging ST community and issued orders after enquiry. That MLA elected on ST certificate.MLA appealed to the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. HC suspended District Collector's order. Due to suspension of the order MLA got relief.

My question is

1)A District Collector is a IAS officer and Magistrate of the District also.Once He/She issued orders about genuinity of a peoples representative's caste after full inquiry on what grounds HC suspends District Collector's order?

2)Why HC not taken action against MLA?

Appeal before the appellate authority

If we are not satisfied by the decision passed by the Banking Ombudsman, to whom should we approach? are there any other recourse and/or remedies available to us as per the law?

In a suit can Governer make as a respondent?

In a Telugu news channel I had seen a news clipping that in A.P. the present C.M.Mr.K.Rosaiah have no constitutional validity to continue as C.M. The learned Advocate on Petitioner side arguing that the present CM has to prove majority to continue as C.M.. For taking no action against continuation of present C.M. it is stated on the TV scrolling that in the suit Governer of A.P is going to make a respondent.


Is it possiable?


Please clarify.

Heart Wishes

I wish All of U a Very Very Happy Diwali.
May Maa Lakshmi bless all of you and full fill desires of all of you.
Heartiest best wishes from me and my family to all of you and your family members.
Regards
adv.kamal.grover@gmail.com
09814110005

How many article in Constitution of India

Writ of Mandamus

A person working under state government has committed bigamy. It is prohibited by his departmental rules. Whether a writ of mandamus can be filed to direct the concerned department to initiate departmental enquiry on him?