Vaibhav Bhole
30 April 2014 at 11:40
Is " Duplum Rule" is applicable in India ? Duplum Rule means interest cannot exceed principal/capital amount. The policy reason behind the in duplum rule is that it serves to prevent the exploitation of debtors by creditors who might otherwise allow interest to accumulate indefinitely. if this is applicable then I would like to know the Supreme Court Judgments on this.
Thanks and Regards,
Vaibhav
Satish Makam
29 April 2014 at 19:58
one person had contested and won as surpunch from andhra pradesh.
he had 3 children born after 2000. but third child died with in one month of birth.
does it count to 3 children or 2 children for the purpose of maximum limit on number of children for contesting elections?
If it is not allowed, to whom it should be complained? tell me the detailed procedure to file a complaint against this issue.
thanking you
pushpakrishna
29 April 2014 at 14:04
Dear experts,
recently the central govt passed a bill Hurriedly regarding A.P.state separated/divided as Telengana and seemandhra separate states from 2nd june,2014.some body has been challenged the same in the hon'ble Supreme Court of India. now it is pending for disposal.
i request the experts through LCJ a clear views about the same and can a govt. pass the such an impartent bills hurriedly though there many impartent bills like women bill etc; is there any legal sanctity for the same.a great wonder the bill was passed closing the cameras for not to visible to the nation.thanq in advance.
Member (Account Deleted)
28 April 2014 at 18:11
!" #
"
$% & ' ()*++
, & ' ()*++
&% -
Member (Account Deleted)
27 April 2014 at 07:31
Any tweet on caste of people without pointing at any individual is a legitimate or not?
Yogesh
26 April 2014 at 23:34
Dear Sir,
I have filed a PIL in SC, and now same PIL listed before the Court on Friday, the 9th day of May, 2014
I have received following email from SC.
From this email I understand only, that I have to go SC on 9 may.
But I don't understand, what SC will do on 9 may. & what I have to do on same date.
Please guide me in details, I am fighting for rights of all Indian innovator & researchers, and willing that some one stand with me at least at guideline level for this great work.
I look forward to receive your reply soon please.
Regards,
Yogesh Sonar
SECTION PIL (WRIT)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 295 OF 2014
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) WITH INTERLCOUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1
(Application for permission to appear and argue-in-person)
Yogesh Parmanand Sonar ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Anr. ... Respondents
TAKE NOTICE THAT the Writ Petition alongwith Interlocutory Application above-mentioned will be listed before the Court on Friday, the 9th day of May, 2014 and will be taken up by the Court on the said day in the forenoon or so soon thereafter as may be convenient to the Court when you are required to appear before this Court on the said date and take such part in the proceedings as may be advised.
Dated this the 9th day of April, 2014.
Assistant Registrar
Member (Account Deleted)
25 April 2014 at 18:10
I have a case & I have posted it in details about it in my query as well. It was about admission of my daughter into MBBS aginst her EAMCET 2013 rank under CAP quota. The case was filed on 16 Jul, regd on 18 Jul and admitted on 8 Aug 2013. EAMCET counselling for special quota ( under CAP quota) held on 11 Sep and then finalised supposedly by 30 Sep 2013. But the honouble Judges despite oral, written submission by my advocate did not take up the case with no reason / explanation cited. I have taken NOC from my Adv and to defend my writ as PIP.I have submitted my request for an urgent hearing to even the CJ of AP High Court has no effect. But court has to hear it as I am not going to quit come what may. I know for sure that hon-ble Judge has no option but to
" to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and: (a) by declaring the action of the respondent No.3in refusing the CAP Certificate to the petitioner No.1, as illegal and unconstitutional (b) to direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to forthwith issue the CAP Certificate to the petitioner No. 1 enabling him to seek the admission of the petitioner No. 2in MBBS Seat in CAP Quota for 2013-2014"
And the University of Health & Science will object as it is delayed by a year etc etc.
What option(s) is/are available to me if the order is not effected with retrospect? What option is available to me to ensure the ZSWO , the Director Sainik Welfare, the GP Home , the Home department officials as well as the Registrar of the High court are brought to book for intentional delay?
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2014 at 18:56
My complaint online to Banking Ombudsman was admitted as a maintainable complaint by the office of the BO Hyd. After two months it disposed of under Clause 8 & 9(3) of the BO Rules 2006 without citing any specific sub rule/clause.And it was communicated only to the accused bank with no intimation to the complainant. The bank has informed me with an extract but without a copy of the order of BO. I read the clause and the subclauses on my own. After exhausting all my avenues for redressal of grievances submitted another complaint with all the relevant documents to BO Hyd by regd post on 14 Mar 2014. After two weeks i have recd a mail online from the personal assistant of BO Hyd informing me that my complaint ( the previous one which was admitted and then disposed off under clause 8 &9(3) of BO Rules 2006 has now been disposed under clause 11. No specific subclause or explanation given except debarring me from making an appeal to Dy Gov under clause 14. Your expert advice please.
Dr G V Rao
24 April 2014 at 11:20
Pls read it as Job instead of jpb..........Sirs, my sincere doubt......in most Government Scientific Depts, the post of Director is only one......however when the post of Director gets vacant, an advertisement is issued and applications sought for. Never are such posts carry provision for reservation for SC/ST and others....Such vacancy is always in the open category and no reservations are met with..Is this legal and allowed. What does Law say about such single posts......
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Wp(c) answering respondent
A notice from Hon'ble high court came to me in above matter where I have to submit my counter reply but as I am not advocate but able to reply, so please show a light in this regard that what is the procedure to submit counter reply? How I can verify and declare my content or what kind of affidavit is required and how can I produce myself identified before the court. All these will be done if I can not provide lawyer. Please clarify and I shall be oblige to all.
From : S.B.Dutta,