arun
16 April 2011 at 14:28
please give me a drafting of a complaint against a chandigarh based police constable, who made fake promise of marriage with a woman and having physical relation without her consent.....but after this incident she said him for their marriage ,but he denied strongly .then she go to court for justice .but even her advocate cleverly met with accused person and without complainant consent withdraw case. this incident is of year 2007 .but still she has not got justice. now she files a complaint in public window(women welfare cell in sector 9 of chandigarh) against police staff .but she has not medically examined herself after the incident of rape i think it is her loose point .. but she engaged me as lawyer .. i am fought her case free of cost.. i have to file a complaint on 19 april i.e.tuesday so i respectfully prayed sir please give me drafting i am fresher in this field....
Rahul Singh
12 April 2011 at 18:37
Need ruling reported in 2004(2)MWN(Cr.)(DCC)pg.106 Madras-P.S.A.Thamotharan v/s Dalmia Cements(B)Ltd.It is regarding writing on the cHEQUE and Signature on the Cheque.
Kindly sent immediately as it is urgent
Anonymous
12 April 2011 at 16:28
NI Act, 1881
Section 125 Crossing After Issue :
Where a cheque is uncrossed, the holder may cross it generally or specially.
Where a cheque is crossed generally, the holder may cross it specially.
Where a cheque is crossed generally or specially, the holder may add the words "not negotiable".
Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker to whom it is crossed may again cross it specially to another banker, his agent, for collection.
Question :
1) Where a cheque is crossed generally, the holder may cross it specially. (so vive - versa is not applicable (means if the cheque crossed is crossed specially, the holder cannot cross generally)) right ?
2) Where a cheque is crossed generally or specially, the holder may add the words "not negotiable".
It means that when the word "not negotiable" is written on the cheque than the cheque cannot be further endorsed to anybody else right ? Eg: a/c payee "not negotiable" to jyoti than jyoti cannot endorsed to anybody else & if the cheque is lost than bank cannot deposited the cheque which contains the word "not negotiable" to the other a/c if the cheque is lost ?
3) Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker to whom it is crossed may again cross it specially to another banker, his agent, for collection.
but if the word "not negotiable" is written than banker can also can't endorsed to any another person or banker. right ?
Thanks.
AJIT KAWATKAR
10 April 2011 at 20:20
The matter is in maharashtra.
A ownership flat belonging to Sr.Citizen-Spinster,in her absence, is taken over by a family some 3 yrs back[no docoments, so trsspasser]the occupier applied for some govt,wefare scheme where in she submitted FORGED LL AGRMNT to the agency[nationalised bank]the copy of that eas sent to the owner by bank about a yr back.We requested the occupier through mediator, to hand over the possession without making known to her about the COPY of FORGED DOBUMENT,But without success.
Since much time has passed,kindly let me know whether we can file Forgery & Tress-passing complaints/suit ? what will be expected success ?
Shirazk
10 April 2011 at 12:36
Our Society Committee members were dismissed by the Deputy Registrar for not filing their indemnity bonds, over a period of time we found out through the society bank account that they had also removed money around 20 lacs under fictitious categories with false vouchers. Now, out of the 5 bldgs that we have, 3 have decided to go in for bifurcation & the proposal was forwarded to the deputy registrar & he put up a notice under section 18 fvor bifurcation. Now the ex committee secretary has gone to the Jt registrar & managed to get a stay against bifurcation proceedings ( instead of approaching the deputy registrar . He has used members who are for bifurcation forging them & showing the Jt Registrar that they are against bifurcation. These signatures were in the society office & were given for some other purpose by the members, some of the signatures even ahve dates on them which are a year old.
Now, when we approached the local police station asking them to file a case against the ex secretary, they are not ready to do so & are asking us to approach the court to ask them to direct the police to initiate an inquiry against him. The police are also telling us that they cannot do any sort of inquiry against him cause he has used our signatures & there is no financials involved so they cannot initiate any sort of inquiry against him.
Kindly let us know what can we do against the ex secretary for using our signatures fraudently & if we can under what law, sections etc ? Over 50 people have signed the letter to the police station & given it to them.
prsmitra
10 April 2011 at 11:33
plz verify the written arguments and give best decision for submit into the court on or before 18-04=2011
Anantha Sowrya
06 April 2011 at 23:57
In the 498a case as here under:
Original Jurisdicition[marriage & last residing]
Wrong Juridscition[case filed and parental home of women]
In the above pare what is the procedure when the first IO[actual] deputes second IO[SHO] for verification at original jurisdcition
Any orders/memos should given to second IO
by the first IO itself, if so, first IO has the powers himself to do so?
OR
Any orders/memos should be taken from the magistrate for by the first IO to depute a second IO for verification in original jurisdiciton.
Can anyone answer with your replies
Note:Question raised such that, the same[deputation] was written in the charge sheet.
vsreddy
06 April 2011 at 22:29
can a family court or a immigration desk at Airport are empowered to seize or impound :
a. passport of an Indian Citizen
b.Passport of a foreign citizen (PIO)
Passport act says that other than passport officer others don't have the powers but there are hearsay and rumours that central govt. have issued a G.O. empowering the family courts.
can I be enlightened on this?
Gagan Souri
31 March 2011 at 22:15
Hello Friends,
A.P. Govt made 498a, a compoundable offence, if no dowry added to it.
i have only 498a on me no DP3 or DP4 but, complainant claimed dowry in the 498a.
Doubts/Questions:
1)Now my 498a, is compoundable is or
non-compoundable.
2)Does police have to take permission/orders from DCP/ACP to visit the accused house and ask him to come to the POLICE STATION.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can police investigate and make arrest even after submission of FR?
Friends,
I am defending a case in which there has been filed negative Final Report by police that no offence is made out and case is of Civil nature. But despite of this fact a senior police official ordered for re-investigation and arrest all the person having been charged. And some of them arrested as well.
I m favoring accused side.
please refer some judgments to come out the situations..Please...