LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Arihant AC   07 October 2009 at 13:20

The Payment of Wages Act

Dear Experts,

Can any body has the notification of change in The Payment of Wages Act for Rs. 6500/- to Rs. 10,000/-

Its Urgent

Regds,
NAC

V.PAVAN KUMAR   06 October 2009 at 18:19

Notice period

Respected Sir,

Our company is issuing appointment letters with a clause that the employee should submit his resignation with 6 months notice period if he wants to resign during the crucial business season (i.e. between Feb.-July.) However, in the normal course, he can submit his paper with 3 months notice period. Will it be valid in the court of law.

In case the employee leaves the company without complianing the said clause, can we take legal action and recover money for the un-noticed period.

I seek your valuable guidance in the matter.

Regards,
PAVAN KUMAR V

jiwan   06 October 2009 at 18:07

salary of holiday

Dear all
Please clear

if monday & tuesday is holiday & employees get leave from monday to saturday .

my question

will he elegible to get salary of holiday - monday,tuesday & sunday

FOR PRIVATE EMPLOYEE

VIJAY VASANT POL   06 October 2009 at 08:35

gratuity

ceiling on gratuity is it amended from 3.5 lacs to 10lacs? if yes then date of implementation.

monika   04 October 2009 at 23:50

VRS

if a person had applied for VRS and the sanction has been accorded by the authorities but the dues have not been setteled and it is more than one and a half years now any case law related to this please help

Suresh C Mishra   03 October 2009 at 21:15

difference b/w regularisation and reinstatement

In an industrial dispute before labour court Lko the LC has decided the case of daily wager who has completed more than one year of conitunuty of service with Mandi Parishad Lucknow The Mandi Parishad has opposed the reference on the basis that the the services of the workman were in a project and he is not entitled for the benefit of section 6 N of UPID Act , 1947
The Labour Court after evidence of the workman closed the case on the basis of a Case with regard to the regularisation of the same department which was based on the case of UMA Devi ( Supra ) holding that the appointment of the daily wager was not in accordance with the due procedure and there fore he is not entitled for any relief . I have decided to move in HC Lko and I have drafted a WP which is attached Please comemnt and suggest me what other to add to succeed in the matter

Suresh C Mishra   03 October 2009 at 21:12

difference b/w regularisation and reinstatement

In an industrial dispute before labour court Lko the LC has decided the case of daily wager who has completed more than one year of conitunuty of service with Mandi Parishad Lucknow The Mandi Parishad has opposed the reference on the basis that the the services of the workman were in a project and he is not entitled for the benefit of section 6 N of UPID Act , 1947
The Labour Court after evidence of the workman closed the case on the basis of a Case with regard to the regularisation of the same department which was based on the case of UMA Devi ( Supra ) holding that the appointment of the daily wager was not in accordance with the due procedure and there fore he is not entitled for any relief . I have decided to move in HC Lko and I have drafted a WP which is attached Please comemnt and suggest me what other to add to succeed in the matter

CA Manmohan   03 October 2009 at 12:06

insustrial dispute

WE HAD TWO UNITS OPERATING UNDER THE SAME NAME. ONE OF THE UNITS LOCATED IN HARYANA WAS CLOSED AND THE WORKERS RAISED DISPUTE BY NOT ACCEPTING THE COMPENSATION OFFERED TO THEM. FOUR OF THE WORKERS MANAGED TO GET THE AWARD EXPARTE IN THEIR FAVOUR FOR CONTINUITY OF SERVICE WITH BACK WAGES. WHILE THE REST PURSUED THE CASE AT THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL. WE MANAGED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE BY PAYING THE WORKERS INCLUDING THREE OF THE WORKERS WHO HAD EXPARTE AWARD IN THEIR FAVOUR. THIS WAS DONE IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ITSELF. ALL THE WORKERS ACCEPTED THE COMPENSATION AND RELENQUISHED ALL THEIR RIGHTS. BUT ONE WORKER WHO HAS AWARD IN HIS FAVOUR HAS APPROACHED THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL FOR COMPUTATION OF BACKWAGES TILL DATE INCLUDING THE BENEFITS WHICH WERE AVAILABLE WHILE THE UNIT WAS FUNCTIONING? IS THIS CLAIM TENABLE?

anshul sangal   03 October 2009 at 08:50

Scope of labour law

Sir what is the scope of labour law as a career point of view in private company for law graduate?