Chinmay Kamat
28 October 2012 at 22:55
Hi,
In most states, registration of partnerships deeds is not compulsory because the partnership act does not mandate it (although it confers certain benefits once it is registered).
My question is, suppose the deed specifies that the partners bring into the firm as capital any immovable property valued over Rs 100, then does the deed need to be registered compulsorily under the Registration Act, 1908.
S 17(1)(b) makes it compulsory for any "non-testamentary instruments which purport or operate to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish, whether in present or in future, any right, title or interest, whether vested or contingent, of the value of one hundred rupees, and upwards, to or in immovable property" to be compulsorily registered.
Please advice.
gopinadh
06 October 2012 at 22:31
Respected seniors,
May please to furnish recent judgement regarding civil courts had no jurisdiction to entertain the application if any litigation arised in agency area... to clarify the same i would like to ask this question. if you have any information regarding the above said subject may please to funish the supreme court judgement which has come in september month
sachin
06 October 2012 at 16:10
Dear Friends,
Can a "Irrevocable Power of Attorney" be reovked?
If yes, what is the procedure?
Regards,
Sachin
prakash vka
06 October 2012 at 14:04
i recived an Fsl report on signature on an cheq which is as follows it is not possible to express any opinion on the authorship of the re enclosed questioned item stamped and marked Q1 in comparision with the enclosed standard items similarly stamped and marked s1 to s30
what should i do now the case is been heared on 9th this month the cheq was signed and written in front of me can I send again to fsl for handwriting expert report
K.Hemachandran
30 September 2012 at 19:37
Sir / Madam,
A person having many PAN card, Driving licence, Bank accounts. In all different names, different fathers name, different date of birth, but photo is the same person. He cheats banks and financial companies, etc... by taking loans or some other financial dealings. He cheats many peoples, in that one is my friend. This person is from a police family. So if give complaint in police station, they do favor to this person. I want to complaint this person for the interest of others. I like to know where I can complaint of this person.
Thanks
K.Hemachandran
(90922 11123)
vijayshukla
27 September 2012 at 22:48
my cousin is working with IT company at Chandigarh for last six months. The owner of the firm do not pay salaries to his staff in time, due to which stff having hard times.The plea is that till funds are generated, salary payments are delayed. Most of staff could join this company as they can't find any other job.The owner take extra work till late night from the staff and gives meagre amt in return so his staff can manage their livelyhood. Please advice how to get timely salary from the firm owner without compromising with the boss
Raman
13 September 2012 at 00:30
Sir, we have been given A.B( for limited duartion) on 498-A/406 sections by the session court with condition that we join the investigation and will return all the artilces to the IO and during the period we have to apply for regulat bail before the area magistrate
We have returned all the artilces and now the police is calling for arrest and bail with surities
Now we ant to first apply for regular bail before Area magistrate as per the order and there is nothing in order of session court that we should apply for bail before police
Now my query is that
whether we have to get two bails one from police and one from Magistrate after getting A.B?
Whether its will going to harm if we staright way go the rea magistare for regular bail rather than visting to police for bail??
Whether police will oppose our regular bail if we straight way go the magistrate??
Sumit Kumar
12 September 2012 at 21:43
Hi, I am Sumit Kumar, pursuing B.Tech [2007-2011] from Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak. I have not yet completed my course due to continuous prevention from university's side to pass students. In Aug 2012, I got my result in which I scored 17/100 in Java which I completely didn't expect. So, I filed an RTI on dated Aug 13th, 2012 against my answer book which I saw on dated Sep 12, 2012 & was shocked to see the checking criteria by the university. The only thing marked with red pen were my marks. Not even tick marks on the paper. Also, for an answer for 2 pages, I got 2 marks & for an answer of 6 pages, I got 6 marks & for some I got 00. They only saw the start & end page of a answer & that too gave a horrible marks without even reading them. This clearly indicates that university is neglecting the checking system so that students pay money for re-appear & re-evaluation.
Also, I suspect that my answer sheet was checked AFTER I filed RTI, & put marks which would constitute to a total of 17/100 which was reflected online on my result.
This time university has failed 90% of the students from my college, most of which scored 17/100.
So, I am planning to file a lawsuit against the university for such obnoxious behavior against students. Please help me in doing so.
I also approached my College but they said that we are not responsible in any of this because the rule of university is that I can only get my answer sheet re-evaluated if I have at least 20% marks which I don't have. They also said that only court can make them change their rule, college can do nothing to help.
munish
12 September 2012 at 18:06
I AM RUNNING THE BUSINESS OF WESTERN UNION MONEY CHANGER AND RECEIVED COMMISSION OF RS: 315000/-. I HAVE ALSO GETTING PROFIT FROM CURRENCY SALE PURCHASE OF RS: 11000/-. CURRENCY SALE OF RS: 730000/- PURCHASE OF RS: 719000/-.
NOW MY QUESTION IS THAT WHAT IS MY GROSS RECEIPT ? SHOULD I LIABLE TO DECLARE MY INCOME 315000 + 730000 = 1045000/- * 8% = 83600/- OR 730000 * 8% = 58400 + 315000 = 373400/- ?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non implemtation of hc judgement - contempt
In a service matter the judgement is passed by the High Court in favour of the petitioner asking the respondent authority to hold a DPC within a period of two month from the date of judgement. The respondent authority, instead of taking initiative to implement the judgemnet took initiative to file a review petition, which the petitioner came to know after getting an RTI application reply asking for the file noting of certain file. Now till date the review petition has not been even after expiry of eight months. The petitioner has filed a contempt petition in which the notice is yet to be issued on the contemners.
My main query is whether the contemner can take a defence that the contempt petition cannot be accept because the department was trying to go for a review of the judgement all these days, but the review petition has not been filed by the government before the court, whereas the petitioner has already filed the contempt petition.