Sunil Pathak
14 December 2010 at 18:18
Dear Sir,
Please tell me what to do when Central Bank of India has submitted false affidavit and obtained judgement as under.
I am giving the facts as under and attaching a file for details also.
1. Mr. P. Methews, advance officer of phaphadih branch, Central Bank of India, Raipur had demanded a bribe of Rs 40000.00.
2. When this bribe was not paid, he started with holding returned DBP documents without collecting material from Railways / Transporters. The Mr. P. Methews, advance officer and branch manager Mr. R.R.Sharma did not allow us also to collect material by refusing to give RR/MTR ( a part of DBP documents). The branch manager has confirmed that they will not give documents in writing in a meeting dated 21.08.1991.
3. These returned bills reached to the tune of Rs 55.00 lacs. The central office of the bank started enquiry against Mr. R.R.Sharma, Branch Manager as to why the material was not collected by branch when the documents were not given to the borrower.
(Mr. Manjunath, the present branch manager of phaphadih branch of the bank has recovered DBP bills documents worth Rs 23.71 lacs in October 2009 still lying in the branch. The list of these bills are given in the proposal dated 10.01.2010 submitted to bank.)
4. Afraid from the enquiry the branch manager Mr. R.R.Sharma and Mr. P. Methews, advance officer tried to start recovery proceedings for this amount Rs 55.00 lacs against me.
5. Central office of the bank did not permit to start legal action against me as it was not my fault.
6. Then Mr. R.R.Sharma and Mr. P. Methews, advance officer decided to misguide their central office to start recovery proceeding against me. Details of misguidance with documentary evidence in shape of correspondence copies between branch manager, regional manager, zonal manager and central office is attached in details attached.
7. This misguidance was forwarded even to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh by central office of the bank, who was finance minister during that period. A letter from HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh is also attached with documentary evidence that the bank misguided him in details. This letter is available at http://www.itimes.com/users/sunil.pathak/blog/Central-Bank-of-India-Loans-Finance-Minister-Business
8. Central Bank of India had given false affidavit and obtained judgment.
9. The present above bank officials including CMD of the bank is trying hard to hide these facts.
10. I have given eight applications under “Right to Information act 2005” against which the bank officials have given excuses to the extent that in an application when I asked the central office of the bank to inform me the reasons of furnishing wrong information to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in 1993 when he was HON”BLE Finance Minister, the bank replied that it is their “matter of commercial confidence”. Giving wrong information about me to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh is their matter of commercial confidence.
11. I had then submitted a facts proposal dated 17.07.2009 and 10.01.2010 on request of the bank incorporating all these photocopies of correspondence between Branch Manager, regional manager, zonal manager and central office proving above said facts that a false case has been made by the bank.
Instead of replying me and withdrawing all mental torture, harassment, irritation, and pressure and recovery proceedings still continuing mental torture, harassment, irritation, and pressure.
12. During my discussions with bank officials, they say that in bank even after knowing fully well no one including CMD has enough courage to admit these facts.
File with details attached here with.All copies of letters of the bank mentioned in details are available with me.
Sunil Pathak
Mb 09425203272
Kruti B. Parekh
02 August 2010 at 15:24
section 292(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 states that for issue of debentures proper BOD meeting is to be convened. However I would like to know whether we can hold BOD through video conferencing for above purpose? I want toknow whether BOD meeting through video conferencing for issue of debenturs is valid or not? can anyone please guide me?
vinod bansal
02 August 2010 at 21:41
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
02 August 2010 at 21:21
Central Bank of India
Dear Sir,
Please tell me what to do when Central Bank of India has submitted false affidavit and obtained judgement as under.
I am giving the facts as under and attaching a file for details also.
1. Mr. P. Methews, advance officer of phaphadih branch, Central Bank of India, Raipur had demanded a bribe of Rs 40000.00.
2. When this bribe was not paid, he started with holding returned DBP documents without collecting material from Railways / Transporters. The Mr. P. Methews, advance officer and branch manager Mr. R.R.Sharma did not allow us also to collect material by refusing to give RR/MTR ( a part of DBP documents). The branch manager has confirmed that they will not give documents in writing in a meeting dated 21.08.1991.
3. These returned bills reached to the tune of Rs 55.00 lacs. The central office of the bank started enquiry against Mr. R.R.Sharma, Branch Manager as to why the material was not collected by branch when the documents were not given to the borrower.
(Mr. Manjunath, the present branch manager of phaphadih branch of the bank has recovered DBP bills documents worth Rs 23.71 lacs in October 2009 still lying in the branch. The list of these bills are given in the proposal dated 10.01.2010 submitted to bank.)
4. Afraid from the enquiry the branch manager Mr. R.R.Sharma and Mr. P. Methews, advance officer tried to start recovery proceedings for this amount Rs 55.00 lacs against me.
5. Central office of the bank did not permit to start legal action against me as it was not my fault.
6. Then Mr. R.R.Sharma and Mr. P. Methews, advance officer decided to misguide their central office to start recovery proceeding against me. Details of misguidance with documentary evidence in shape of correspondence copies between branch manager, regional manager, zonal manager and central office is attached in details attached.
7. This misguidance was forwarded even to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh by central office of the bank, who was finance minister during that period. A letter from HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh is also attached with documentary evidence that the bank misguided him in details. This letter is available at http://www.itimes.com/users/sunil.pathak/blog/Central-Bank-of-India-Loans-Finance-Minister-Business
8. Central Bank of India had given false affidavit and obtained judgment.
9. The present above bank officials including CMD of the bank is trying hard to hide these facts.
10. I have given eight applications under “Right to Information act 2005” against which the bank officials have given excuses to the extent that in an application when I asked the central office of the bank to inform me the reasons of furnishing wrong information to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in 1993 when he was HON”BLE Finance Minister, the bank replied that it is their “matter of commercial confidence”. Giving wrong information about me to HON”BLE Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh is their matter of commercial confidence.
11. I had then submitted a facts proposal dated 17.07.2009 and 10.01.2010 on request of the bank incorporating all these photocopies of correspondence between Branch Manager, regional manager, zonal manager and central office proving above said facts that a false case has been made by the bank.
Instead of replying me and withdrawing all mental torture, harassment, irritation, and pressure and recovery proceedings still continuing mental torture, harassment, irritation, and pressure.
12. During my discussions with bank officials, they say that in bank even after knowing fully well no one including CMD has enough courage to admit these facts.
File with details attached here with.All copies of letters of the bank mentioned in details are available with me.
Sunil Pathak
Mb 09425203272