Nagendra
04 April 2015 at 12:41
I booked a ticket from Allahabad to Howarah in the month of december and due to any reason train was cancelled on the day of journey and It was important to go there hence I managed to go with another train.In the mean while I talked to the customer care executive about the cancellation of the train she told me to drop a mail with your registered e-mail id to irctc and ask them to cancel the ticket.I sent a mail to them without informing pnr detail etc.3 days I checked my mail and irctc wrote me as you have not registered for TDR so we can not refund you. I think it is cheating because they can cancel my ticket automatically as in case of wait list ticket they do and can refund in my account.Now they are saying they are bound with the rules and regulations.In the era of consumerism how they can show their irresponsible behavior towards their customers? What should I do? Am I guilty? I am feeling cheated.
askar ali baig
04 April 2015 at 11:01
Sir, I have written and given an agreement of sale in the year 1998. It's written like this. I have received an amount of Rs 1 lakh as advance for the sale of a portion of the property. There is no mention of the balance amount to be paid for registration. No witness for it. Property document house tax water and electricity is on my name. It is self acquired property.
Now they claim it is sold and the house is theirs. Pl. Guide whether this agreement is valid in the court of law.
Askar
armaan
04 April 2015 at 10:55
There is a trust registered with two trustees in feb 2010 with two trustees.One of the trustee has died.What would be the status and how to appoint new trustee?
UMMkalantar
04 April 2015 at 10:37
Dear Experts
The brief of past of the case (we are plaintiff):
Our OS is dated July 2013 (Emergency & Permanent); the defendant also filed OS in July 2014. Both are together heard by the same court. Our OS suit in the City Civil Court is for bare injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff in demolition and reconstruction of a three storey building. Inspite of the Police complaint, the Hon’ble High Court direction to Police to enquire based on our CSR and the municipal corporation letter to police to provide police protection to demolish the un-demolished single storey, we are unable to commence demolition work for which the police authority cites the reason of pending court case.
To protract and prolong the case, the defendants filed interim applications on the ground that our plaint suffers from insufficient cause of action and court fees etc under O7R11 of CPC. The learned judge rejected which was again contested by the defendants in the High Court as revision petition under article 227 of the constitution, which was also dismissed by the Hon’ble High Court; consequently connected miscellaneous petition are closed. No Cost. We are awaiting interim order.
Yet to be demolished one floor is in a dangerous condition of collapse which is danger to public and traffic, that is mentioned in our plaint. We could not go near our building. The defendants are unlawfully threatening us. Further, we are forfeiting our Municipal charges paid for planning and building permission due to target time expiry which is over one lakh rupee.
Experts what additional steps we have to take start our demolition works. The next summer holidays are going to come? What is the significance of interim order of our prayer?
The defendants threatening us with further writ petition to protract the case? Is it permissible?
Thanks in advance.
SOUNDARA RAJAN
04 April 2015 at 10:17
Sirs, For Specipic Performence case can court fee paid instalments or any exemption or not paying court fees
Sundar XXXXXXX
04 April 2015 at 10:04
Prestige Lakeside Habitat is a Benchmark Project from the well known Prestige group.
When I look at the agreement between the owners of the land and Prestige, it is actually a development agreement, where the owners give builder the right to develop and sell apartments and villas. As compensation the builder agrees to share revenues with some owners and provide built up areas of a certain area to others.
As of now the builder has not met any of his obligation to the owners.So I think he does not technically have the right to sell to any third party. But the project has been launched for general public.
Given such a scenario, if I book a property in this project, would it not be necessary to add a clause in my agreement that indemnifies me against any future litigation?
Thanks
Sundar
Ashita Kohli
04 April 2015 at 08:58
Dear Sir/Madam,
I own a flat on the 26th floor and have received a complaint from the flat below me that they are facing leakage problem from my flat and that thier ceiling in the master bedroom is getting damanged rapidly. We have an attached Master bathroom in the bedroom.
The building has got its OC in April 2007. On of my well wishers had once suggested that as per ByeLaws, incase a building has not completed 8 years from the date of its OC and there are any leakages observded from the flooring then I will not have to bear the cost of repairs provided the flooring work is not done i.e. its the same as provided by the builder. The work can be done on mutual understanding betweeen me and below flat owner by splitting 50% cost.
Need to know how true it is or any other solution to it. That is how do i respond to the society and what should be the work around.
Second thing is that society is harrassing us for a leakage from the kitchen Nani trap. Way back in Sep 2012 the issue was raised by them and repairs were done by us from the plumber provided by building. Cost of repairs was borne by us. Again after a year they are complaining about leakage. We havent received any complaint from the flat below with regards to this however society keeps complaining that 18th floor is complaining about it. Now my question is that incase there is a leakage from my flat then below flat should be the most affected i,e, 25th floor and not directly the 18th floor.
Need to know that how are leagakes from Nani trap detected and who should carry out the repairs.
vicky
04 April 2015 at 08:00
am staying in an apartment for the last 4 years. While I have only one car park as per the rental agreement, I have 2 cars and when I discussed with he society about the charges they said the same would be 1k per month and I paid the same for 3 months. Post this I was told to hold paying the charges as they were allocating slots and so on. Now the next I hear from them is after 4 years saying that I have to pay all dues. This is in spite of them not raising the bills till date. Now during this period my car also had damages due to tree residue , children playing where in I had to replace my wind shields. As a tenant I have not gone back to the society on this damage issue and raised bills. Today out of the blue isince there is a new committee is it right for the society to raise back dated bills and say that they cannot be held responsible for damages of the car?. Should it not be that since they raise back dated bills for 4 years I could also pay the differential ( bills less costs of damage) and close this issue?
lalatendu das
03 April 2015 at 23:53
Dear sir I had execute an agreement to sale a property of my grandfather. Both my father and grandfather were passed away now my sisters want to cancel that agreement by refunding the amount. Is it possible to revoke the agreement and is there any limitation for it.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Migrant labours
Sir
The recent meeting by Labour department and asking us to furnish Migrant Labour details with Tamil Nadu construction workers welfare Board for the benefit of them.
Let us know what are the benefits for them?
Who will pay for them?
Moreover the people are not working with one firm constantly
Please advice for implement.