Seema
01 January 2016 at 23:08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8102 of 1990 ==================================================== SAYED IQUBAL SIRAT HUSSAIN - Petitioner(s) Versus SECRETARY &3 - Respondent(s) ==================================================== Appearance : PARTY-IN-PERSON for Petitioner No(s).: 1. DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent No(s).: 1. MR SI NANAVATI for Respondent No(s).: 2,3. RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 4. ==================================================== Date : 03/08/2005 ORAL ORDER 1. 1. CORAM : HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KS JHAVERI This petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to fix the date of confirmation for the purpose of payment of pay, allowance and increment and to grant seniority etc., The petitioner was working with the respondent Mill. His services came to be terminated and, therefore, he was allegedly reinstated. The present petition is filed praying for other benefits. 1. It is reported that the Mill is already closed and no useful purpose would be served by proceeding with the matter. Therefore, rule is discharged with no order as to costs.
by
Seema
on 01 January 2016
Can some one explain me the above disposed order? Plz
by
Seema
on 01 January 2016
Can Mr Iqbal ishrat make an appeal on account of his of or other allowances?
by
Seema
on 01 January 2016
If yes then how can it applied for?
by
Seema
on 01 January 2016
Plz let me know soon
bairareddy
01 January 2016 at 22:04
We are 3 sons ..our father sell his ancestral property to my younger brother 7 days back & he applied for change of katha...myself & elder brother not signed in the reg paper...& my elder separated us from 20 year back ...can we prevent the sale deed with out making kath to my yung brother @ grama panchayath as per law
..
bairareddy
01 January 2016 at 22:01
We are 3 sons ..our father sell his ancestral property to my younger brother 7 days back & he applied for change of katha...myself & elder brother not signed in the reg paper...& my elder separated us from 20 year back ...can we prevent the sale deed with out making kath to my yung brother @ grama panchayath as per law
..
Sudipta Dutta
01 January 2016 at 21:37
Sir,
We are a private Ltd. company incorporated under the company act 2013. Having 6 directors with following no. of shares
a) 4500
b) 200
C) 300
d) 1667
e) 1666
f) 1666
We took a resolution in a meeting where (a), (d), (e), (f) were present to open bank A/C with a bank and to be operated by (e) & (f) and they will be the authorised signatories for all transactions of the company.
Suddenly due to some difference of opinion (a) has intimated the bank to block the a/c.
Accordingly the bank has stopped operation.
My question, is it as par law is correct from the side of the bank to stop operation without getting any resolution of board.
jitendra
01 January 2016 at 20:28
Dear concerned,
my home loan has been sanctioned by DHFL but it is not being disbursed because seller's registry done on order of court.
Judgement date is 12/05/1989
after that first Registry done on 14/04/1996
Now DHFL is asking about the court order but we don't have it.
We also searched in court but as per court it was not found.
So plz suggest me what can we do so that my loan get disbursed.
I have tax payments copy.
I have dakhil khariz report/namantaran.
Please reply soon.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
01 January 2016 at 18:48
Dear Ld Friends
I made a below compliant against the Biased Police Officer who is investigating my matter and arrest was made and fled the accused from police custody on consideration. Is the Magistrate has the powers in any Indian Laws to take action against biased Police Officer of the State.
Case filed before Magistrate as
Complainant name VS State of UP
What the Other relief and how way I may approach to Magistrate court CJM for the removal of the SO from his police job permanently.
Complaint as follows:-
APP. FOR “SUSPENSION & DISMISSAL” OF THE BIASED
GOPAL CHAUHAN (S.O) 9984215021 & 8738991180
OF THANA CIVIL LINES, MUZAFFARNAGAR.
ART. 350 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
+ PUBLIC SERVANTS INQURIES ACT 1850
+ S. 7, 10, 11, 12 13, OF - THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988.
+ S.4, 9, 11, 15, 28 OF - U.P GOVERNMENT SERVANTS CONDUCT RULES 1956
+ S.34, 109, 119, 120B, 166, 167, 177, 182, 193, 196, 199, 203, 211,213, 217, 218, 219, 500, 506, 511 - INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860.
Resp Sir,
1. That a legal complaint was registered at Thana Civil Lines, Muzaffarnagar at Crime 478/15 of incident dated 31.08.2014 on their General Diary 10.03.2015 under Sec 34, 323, 327, 356, 392, 403, 427, 447, 506 thru Muzaffarngar Magistrate Court orders into which necessary arrest was made on dated 27.12.2015 and I bore private expenses of Rs 10000/- Ten Thousand paid by me Mr KK Agarwal Advocate himself to Gopal Chauhan for journey, Vehicle and eating expenses and other expenses with police team went to Rishikesh, Uttarakhand and one accused living at Saharanpur, but after that arrest at city Rishikesh the accused Anil Kumar and his wife Usha got fled from the legal system adopted by the major corrupt police officers/public servants deputed at Thana Civil Lines, Muzaffarnagar with the criminal conspiracy planned by Gopal Chauhan SO malafide personal ulterior motive who had taken part in investigating the matter for consideration took from accused and used me as a ATM Machine to pay expenses for reaching out to the accuseds at Rishikesh on my Expenses and then make a heavy illicit money amount extract/elicit from the accuseds and make my Solid Case weaken by removing the “non-bailable Sections 327 and 392 removed” himself and gave direct illicit bail in the all sections in Thana Civil Lines himself and turned the case into a simple and normal case of incident and help the accuseds for saving the legal punishment of law. That the sections 327 and 392 IPC were ordered by the magistrate Court and cannot be removed or break out till the Magistrate court not take legal action on the submitted charge sheet. The Arrest was made in all sections including Sec 327 and Sec 392 at Rishikesh but when he took bribe and consideration from the accuseds he himself act as a Magistrate and took advantage of the situation and did illegal act under the Indian Laws for not taking remand application moved by the Arresting Officer before Magistrate. Copy of the FIR 478/15 attached below.
2. That the arrested criminal in night on dated 27-12-2015 were removed from the Police custody of the Thana Civil Lines inside and were stayed at the local Hotel nearer to the Thana Civil Lines at city Muzaffarnagar and in the morning again put back to the Thana Civil Lines for showing that the accuseds were in the police custody. That the whole incident of crime shows that the major police officers are working for just illicit money and supporting Hard core criminals and spreading heinous crime in the society. That these type of police officers are an abuse on the U.P State Police service and will be removed and sack out immediately from their public servant services for saving other peoples life of India.
3. That at the time of Arrest the accuseds Anil Kumar and Usha had beaten me with their relatives Sanjeev Goyal, HariMohan and Meenakshi Goyal etc and accomplice supporter in perpetrated crime at city Rishikesh towards me but the Gopal Chauhan and his police team not stopped any one of it and they did new crime perpetrated against me. That the Gopal Chauhan and his police team with accuseds had ran away with the Private hired Boolaro without me and after that I came alone thru Roadways Bus thru Rookree at my city Muzaffarnagar.
+ PRAYER +
Hence it is humbly request to you kindly suspend immediately the Gopal Chauhan SO and may take further legal action for the complete termination and dismissal of this corrupt and biased Police officer for the UP State Police Service so that in future no further this type of incident may happen to anyone aggrieved and complainant citizen of India in UP State in any cases. The one dirty fish makes all pond dirty and this Gopal Chauhan is the same dirty fish in UP Police service.
deepa
01 January 2016 at 18:16
Sir,
I have a daughter aged 7 years. We are going for 13 (1) A divorce from my husband who is severe alcoholic. Now he has been diagnosed for end stage renal disease: advised for kidney transplantation, liver also damaged. He has not paid me any alimony also. In future he is not in a position of survival also. The problem is in mediation he is forcing me to take my daughter to his place for visitation. Is it right on his part to ask like this. My question is sir first of all I am unemployed, he is not having income nor healthy, why should I take my daughter to his place for visitation. Since 3 years we are seperated, he never asked for seeing her then. Now that he is going to divorce me he is shamelessly asking me to bring my daughter to his place. My query is
1. Can I not deny visitation for such cruel husband.
2. Is there a rule in supreme court that I should take my daughter to his place for visitation.
3. Is my child going to gain any love from such a father who threw her out of house.
I don't want to give him visitation at all, if any what should I do about it sir.
In mediation conditions he has said about it and blackmailing me if I accept then only he will divorce me. Or else I have to be just annulled.
chandu
01 January 2016 at 18:09
flat is on joint name 1) mother & daughter in law name , mother died with nomination of her daughter in law son and daughter name and both was minor at the time of nomination, but now daughter in law wants of transfer 100% shares in her name.
as on date son is major but daughter in minor but they are ready to relinquish their right to their mother name without any objection.
sir i have following query
1. can on behalf of minor her legal representative can give NOC infaver of mother.
2. is society transfer form required in above case??.
3.
nayak chetna
01 January 2016 at 18:09
HI sir,
I am student of final ll.b. i hv moot court in sec 125 of crpc. can u pls guide me how cn i prepare docs for case of maintenance from petitioner n opponent both the sides.
Thank u,
chetna nayak
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Tenant cannot be seen by me since august, 2015
Dear experts,
One of my tenants passed away 15 years back. He is survived by his wife and two sons. After, the original tenant passed away, the bill is being issued in his wife's name. His wife was last seen by me in August, 2015. His wife and his elder son went to Hajj Pilgrimage last year August. His elder son returned back about 1 month. His wife did not return. His sons say that their mother went to her native place Darbhanga, Bihar to settle some property dispute. I asked the elder son that how much does it take to settle a property dispute? The elder son told me her mother came to Kolkata in November, 2015 for a couple of days and again went to Bihar and I was out of station that time. As you experts, informed me earlier thet as per the amended west Bengal premises tenancy act, the tenancy cannot be inherited by the sons after the original tenant's wife's death. All the couriers and mails in the tenant's wife's name are now signed and received by the elder son's wife, who is at home most of the time. I personally think, the sons are hiding some fact about their mother.
What are the guidelines to prove that the tenant's wife is not staying in the rented flat since August, 2015, so that I could file an eviction suit ?
Regards,
Sabir