Ajaykumar Sanghavi
11 December 2014 at 22:03
If there are more then one persons named in the FIR, and after investigation of the , investigation agency filed charge sheet under sec. 173 of the Crpc. against only 1 person. is it mandatory to file the report under sec. 169 of the Crpc against the remaining the accused whose name was mentioned in the FIR.?
Ajaykumar Sanghavi
04 February 2014 at 12:39
under the said Act called POCSO , what is the manner of taking cognizance by the special court? whether the production of the accused is made to the Special court or before the Concerned Magistrate in whose jurisdiction the offence is committed?
Ajaykumar Sanghavi
16 December 2013 at 16:18
can the petition under Section 13(3) of the Reg. of birth and death act, to register the birth entry of the person who is not alive, is trainable by law?
Ajaykumar Sanghavi
05 January 2012 at 12:28
I am a practicing advocate since 2004,i have completed Bocm llb. and now i am looking to do master degree in law.pl guide me to choose between my home university which is saurashtra uni. and national law universities .is there any difference regarding future prospects between these university?
Ajaykumar Sanghavi
28 February 2010 at 20:01
the prosecutrix says that she allowed sexual intercourse because male partner assured her and give promise that he would marry with her. then male partner says "no"
Female is age of 20 yrs and male partner is 22 years and both are from different communities.she says that she gave a consent because of that promise. whether offence of i.p.c.376 is preprepared? what is the impact of section 90 of i.p.c.? it means consent
Anonymous
10 February 2010 at 23:34
I am junior advocate from gujarat.in 2009 gujarat public service commission has published the advertisement for the filling of vacances of Assistant public procecutor.in adv. the minimum qualified marks for oral interview was not mentioned.and at the time of interview all of candidates who wre qualified were asked to achive minimum 10 marks out of 50 marks in oral interview.the rule has been changed and introdused after the advertisemen.after declaring the final result we were surprised to find that almost 180 candidate were declered fail for not geting 10 marks.even though the written marks of the unsuccessfull candidate was much higher than the succesful candidate.for e.G. i have got 203 marks in written and 8 marks in oral but the candidate who have secured 160 marks in written and 10 marks in oral they were declared pass. so aggrived by this types of unjustice we have filled letter pattern appeal no 1586/2009 and the appeal is allowed by the court, and and cancel the merit list and ordered to make fresh merit list without minimum marks in oral exam.containg aggrigate marks of both writtem and oral exam
G.PS.C has filled the slp no 3584/2010 in supreme court against the said order...so pl advise us on the merits of the case.
i attached the judfement of lpa 1584/2009 here with
thank you
Ajaykumar Sanghavi
23 November 2009 at 01:05
Dear sir,
my client has let out a blank chque to his working partner. The partner has presented the cheque after 4 years in 2008.the cheque contained only signature and all other detais are filled by the complainant. and the amount filled by complainant is rs 1,00,000/- There is no record that the amount is legally enforceble debt. so what should be the defence?
pl Guide me
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
offence of ipc 409
I want to know whether secretary of co op society can be booked under section 409? Whether auditor has locus standy to file a complaint against the secretary of the co op society based on the audit report?