application under crpc 457

as an order passed in conection with Sec 457 is an interloctory order no revision will lie. and more important, an application U/S 457 is applicable for the in-custody of the seized articles which were not produced before the Court, but only a sezure list was produced. if the seized articles were produced before the Court pl file the application Sec-451 Cr.P.C. in my opinion unless and untill u prove that the seized articles belongs to u by filing proper documents, the Court shall not allow the in-custody of the ornaments.  

as an order passed in conection with Sec 457 is an interloctory order no revision will lie. and more important, an application U/S 457 is applicable for the in-custody of the seized articles which were not produced before the Court, but only a sezure list was produced. if the seized articles were produced before the Court pl file the application Sec-451 Cr.P.C. in my opinion unless and untill u prove that the seized articles belongs to u by filing proper documents, the Court shall not allow the in-custody of the ornaments.  

what mr.parthaprotim says is correct u follow the same for your proplem

 It is wrong to state that the no revision lies against the interlocutory order. There are several dicisions in this regard. If the material supports the claim of the complainant then minor discrepancy should not come in the way. The complainant at first should pray calling for the IO report in this regard and if the IO support the claim of the complainant then the court generally come in the way. Pursue vigorously your case in Motion.