Collection of evidence by unfair means

Looking forward for answer of this query,

Nishant

Still awaiting any answer to this query,

Experts, plz share your knowledge on this query.

Nishant

If the document submitted in the court is authentic, Court does not take cognizence whether method to procure it was genuine or not!

Thanks Mr. Rajiv Lodha,

Plz refer to point no. 2 of my query above, how anyone else is supposed to know when  Party B operated its locker, if bank employee (locker account) is sharing such information with Party A, it is a breach confidentiality which is required between bank and customer.  Can Party B demands actions against Party A for using unfair means to get its confidential information. 

Similary for point no. 5 GPF records are again a very confidential statement, no one else should have access to it.

I want to know one more thing, that can it be proved about Party B that it knows car driving, as it has a valid driving license, actual scenario is that Party B learned Driving almost 20 years back and that time get the lincense made.  Can Party B claims that when it has not driven any vehicle in last so many years, it is equivalent to "no driving experience" situation.

Thanks,

Nishant

Do not drain urself, be specific what proofs party A & B have to prove their point!

As long as evidecnes are correct, court is not bothered about how they are obtained. In fact other party can ask based on documents verification from source.

Even it is received by filing rti, its authenticity can be challanged. u can challange it if the facts are something else. In that case the pio will be called in the court and he has to explain its authenticity.