LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

A. Mohamed Thaheer (Advocate)     17 December 2012

Indian penal code

Dear friend,

I am posting the following case for Legal opinion with citation of Latest case of supreme court of India.

 

"X" has forged the signature of "Y" in the Application Form claiming relief from Govt as pecuniary compensationfor his damaged crops and the same was counter-signed by his two superior Officers recommending relief.]

But "one Z " has submitted Advanced Stamp Receipt by forging the signature of "Y" for claiming the above said relief.

The Officials claimed the amount under good faith that "z" is "Y".after attesting the signature of "Z". 

Subsequently,One "A" received the cheque for the compensation amount forging the signature of "Y" and the same was also attested by the Official in good faith that the person received the cheque was "Y".

In the above case, "X" is charged under section 467, 468, 471, 477-! r/w 34 IPC and u/s section 13 (1)(c)read with 34 IPC r/w 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act?

Whether "A" is liable for the above offences, since he has not signed the valuable security and also theAdvanced stamp receipt for having received the amount

Please quote case law in favour of "A" if any



Learning

 1 Replies

V R SHROFF (Sr. ADVOCATE Bombay High Court Mob: 9892432152)     23 December 2012

NOE BEING ADVOCATE WHY NOT FIND IT UR SELF???

 

Also  show us TRUE COPY  of decree/ judgement


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register