Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 07:42
Q1)please give me info @ ,sanctioned post of motor driver in your office, working driver list with name , posting date answer) ,5 is sanctioned post , 4 is working post, disclosure of name/detailed information of the officials working as motor drivers is exempted under 8(1) g of rti act. Q2) running of vehicle per year from 2000 to 2010 answer) available information from only 2005 detail is ..... Q3) copy of information book of vehicle where mentioned average per kilometer is mentioned answer) vehicle company has not given average of the running km per liter in writing to this office. PLEASE GIVE ME SUGGESTION FOR FURTHUR ACTIONED
Dr.Mukesh Yadav
08 July 2010 at 12:06
Dear Sir
I have filed a PIL in the Supreme Court in 2008 (Case No.W.P.No.124 of 2008) under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Case is fixed for final disposal since August 2009, but every time date is postponed. This time No date is displayed for hearing. I am feeling frustrated that if I am not able to get justice from Apex Court where should I go? to whom I should contact?
I want t plead my own case along with some Senior Advocate please guide me and oblige
Anonymous
07 July 2010 at 13:39
Ld counsels,
There is a criminal case instituted with malafide intensions and the police have fabricated the records of the criminal case. Can I approach the high court for quashing the criminal case and also for directions to initiate disciplinary action against the poilice oficers.
To me it appears that the cause of action is same for both the reliefs and I also have a SC judgement of the case below that Article 226 can be invoked fo quashing the criminal proceedings.
('Pepsi Foods Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others [(1998)5 SCC 749]')
Kindly clarify whether the writ petition will be maintainable with the above 2 reliefs. Thanks
Anonymous
06 July 2010 at 14:12
Somewhere I read that if only a third person starts using RTI Act the whole rotten Govt.system can be set right within months.I wanna add that if only a third person starts using secret spy cameras also,which are available in just Rs.1000/-per piece(Or in future they would be available in just Rs.400-500/-per piece.)The whole rotten system can be set right even in weeks ?
What are your suggestions and expectations ?
Anonymous
05 July 2010 at 14:27
Would I have to face the court myself or Would Govt.provide me some advocate to fight my case ?
Anonymous
05 July 2010 at 09:45
Ld Counsels,
Is it possible to file a writ petition under Art.226 & 227 praying for disciplinary action against police for fabricating the records of criminal case and to quash the criminal proceedings instituted out of such malafide intensions.
Kindly clarify.
Anonymous
04 July 2010 at 17:58
are the service book of govt servant ELIGIBLE TO BE ISSUED UNDER RTI ACT ? SOME RTI REFERENCE PLEASE.
Anonymous
04 July 2010 at 17:53
are the service books of govt servant eligible to be issued under RTI ACT?
Anonymous
04 July 2010 at 16:56
Ld Counsels,
Is it possible to seek joint hearing of Writ appeal and Writ petition before the High court. The matter in both the proceedings are related to a criminal case but the respondents in both the proceedings (WP and WA) will be different.
WA will be againt the office of public prosecutor and WP will be against the office the polcie officers.
Please clarify.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
unequal opportunity
dear members,
Ugc is organizing NET examination in June and Dec. every year, since many years for lecturer ship. There was no provision of negative marketing. In the Net Examinations of Dec.2009 UGC imposed condition of negative marking in paper 1 and 2. Now in recent notification from UGC the condition of negative marking has been vaved from NET examination of June 2010. Thus the condition of negative marking was made applicable for the candidates appeared in Dec.2009 Examination.
My daughter appeared in the NET examination of Dec.2009 and she was declared unsuccessful for only 1 number in paper 1 and 2. If the condition was not made applicable for Examination of Dec.2009 she would have been cleared it.
This is clear cut case of unequal opportunity in the eyes of constitution as no equity has been maintained.
Please guide me what I have to de and take legal steps. I have already written a letter to UGC for reconsideration of the matter and lifting condition of negative marking from all examinations and re announcing the result accordingly.