Hi Experts,
I have a pending 66A on me, without any other IPC sections. In all probability the case will be nullified because of the repeal.
The trial phase was over. Only the final argument from my side was pending when 66A was repealed. So far, our side has been incredibly strong, as the prosecution has totally messed up their part, primarily because they didnt have any evidence, their only witnesses were the police IO and DCP. Both the witnesses stated that they have not done the investigation and pointed at each other. Moreover, in the chargesheet they mentioned a hard drive , supposedly seiged from me, which is a complete lie, and they could neither reproduce the HD nor could tell when it was seiged , and by whom. Basically, the whole prosecution reeks of malice.
However, now that I was at the fag end of the proceedings, about to win the case, 66A has been repealed.
Can I still file for damages, and malicious prosecution ?
thanks
Nandan
Sir ,
It is experienced that cheque bounce cases are not being adjucated by the courts under sec 147 , . inspite of complaining under this sec . Kindly share ur viewes on this expect.
Respected Sir,
I acquired the following qualifications
1) 10th standard recognized by Karnataka State Board
2) 3 years Full time Diploma in Electrical Engineering recognized by Board of Technical Education Karnataka
3) A.M.I.E in Electronics & Communication recognized by Institution of Engineers ( India ). KOlkatta. This is quivalent to Bachelor of Engineering graduate & recognized by MHRD ( Ministry of Human resource development ).
Now can i persue LLB as a fulltime or by correspondence.
Please advice
cheers
Narahari
Dear Experts.
A civil petition under O7/R1 is pending over 2 years for permanent & IA. We are petitioners. Due to unlawfull stoppage of demolition, the undemolished building is in a state of collapse. The defendants are forcing us to sell the property otherwise they threaten to prolong the case to any level. A revision of interim Application under article 227 of the constitution in the High Court by the defendants under the rejected Order7/Rule11 was dismissed. Now it is time for short order. Again defendents are in the Hon’ble High Court for revision for striking off our suit. Kindly guide us.
Respected Experts,
My Uncle is working as Branch Manager in private media Company. One of his Customers placed advertisements. Ads are currently running.
Towards payment, Customer has made payments to the Savings Bank account of my Uncle instead of current account of media Company. Reason is Customer wanted to save money on taxes, for which my Uncle told him to pay to his SB account towards this objective. My Uncle instead of passing on the payment to media Company has paid only part amounts and some more money is yet to be paid (around 3 lakhs). Media Company after coming to know about this, is in the process of filing Police complaint against my Uncle.
Media company has given one weeks' time to settle payment. If money not paid in one week, I know he will be arrested. Kindly let me know what are the type of offences that have been committed.
1. Is it misappropriation or embezzlement or cheating or criminal breach of trust?
2. What are his chances of securing bail?
Look forward to your valuable inputs please.
Can any one share with me the judgement of Hon'able Supreme court of India, Hon'able High Court of India and Consumer Court in context of the failure of public bank to credit the amount to the international beneficiary through the International Foreign Outward Remittance service provided by the bank.
My friend has a tenement in a free hold plot owning society. He purchased the ground floor of the said tenement through register sale deed and the 1st floor has been sold out to a third party without giving chance to my friend.My friend has come to knowledge that the first floor has been sold 7 yrs back through register sale deed and the owner of the said first floor has started construction on the first floor. What are legal options open for my friend.
Dear Friends,
I am married 4 years back & have 2 years kid. My wife is not coperating with me from the second day of marriage & fighting with me since then. After 2 years of marriage we got kid, thinking my wife behavior will change, but same not happened, now taking the aid of child, she fights like anything, abuses my parents on phone, do all kind of non sense activities, i tried my level best patching up but unable to do so, inspite we are staying in other city, neither my parents are staying with us,
day by day fight went to untolerable level & thought quitting my job & go to our hometown where both my parents & in laws stay, thinking some relief will be there. In hometown too, we took seperate house not involving my parents , she stayed with me for hardly 15-20 with me & 1 day fight happened & there parents came & took there daughter & kid with them in absence of me,
Now it is more than a month, where my wife neither my in laws contacted me, & they are passing wrong rumors in market blaming my parents that they have intentionally called me to hometown, i approached all of there relatives, everyone lifted there hands from this problem.
I am totally lost, not in a position to decide what should i do, shall i approach parivar paramarsha kendra, or file rcr or divorce, yes its true its very difficult to manage my wife but my child is also away from me, biggest problem is also my in-laws interference as they dont have any son, only 2 daughters, bigger one is my wife, smaller one married 2 years back & now mutual consent divorce is going for her, there family is bit financially strong & when some hot talks went between me & my in law, they say we will file dowry case on you but i know they never will do unless i approach legally, also my father in law is lawyer
Please suggest what to do, considering we are in same city
Ca I use this central "The Powers-of-attorney act, 1882" to book online railway tickets on client's behalf becoming their attorney though without being a railway agent?
354 d as non bailable
Hello All,
We have lodges a complaint against a person for sending sms and calling a women, the police registered a case u/s 354D and grant him bail right away.
but the person is continuously sending the sms and calls. We approached the court with the request that please book him under non-bailable as this is second offense. now the lawyer of opposite party says the 354D becomes non-bailable only after conviction in first case.
Query : what is the best remedy in law available with women to save herself from such sms and phone calls.
2. is 354 D would not become non-bailable at second offence when the first one is still under trial only.
thanks in advance for your support .