Can stay in a property with senior citizen as caretaker in which application is forwarded for title
Dharmaraj
(Querist) 24 May 2013
This query is : Resolved
Hi,
My query is that, my in laws are in dispute with each other over the property they stay, my mother has registered a case in Rule 39 sec 151 of CPC, the first hearing is on 27-05-2013, however my father in law wants me to shift to another floor in the same building with my wife, the said flat is locked and my mother in law has included this property as well in her suit, my father in law who is senior citizen and her mother is over 100 says will apply a prayer in court asking the court to grant permission on grounds as caretaker for them, i.e him and his mother, would this prayer be granted permission.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 24 May 2013
court may appoint receiver for property. your father in law can continue as agent of court receiver depending upon conditions imposed by court
Dharmaraj
(Querist) 24 May 2013
Thanks for the answer Ajay Sir, please understand that my mother in law is already claiming maintainence from my father in law but they both stay in the same house situated at the 3rd floor on the terrace they have constructed a barsati type of structure for me and my wife to stay there and help in daily course of my father in law and her mother who is now more than 100 year of age, however when we were shifting some time back one of my sister in law called police and they said that it would not be possible for continue shifting without settling the issue, however the summons that has been received talk of my mother in law claims from the property, kindly advice
ajay sethi
(Expert) 25 May 2013
if said structure forms part of suit claim your father in law cannot create any third party rights in respect of said structure without court permission . matter is sub judice . seek directions from court to permit you to reside in said structure
R.V.RAO
(Expert) 07 April 2014
agree with sri ajay sethi ji.
Guest
(Expert) 10 December 2014
Well advised
Anirudh
(Expert) 10 December 2014
SHAME ON THIS FELLOW TO ATTEND THIS ONE YEAR OLD QUERY.
HE IS TRYING ALL THESE GIMMICS TO HIDE HIS FALSE AND FRADULENT PROFILE.
This fellow cannot even be a last person one can consult for any advice.
This fellow is good for nothing. Many a times he gives advices which are not supported by law.
TAKE THIS FELLOWS FALSITY IN HIS PROFILE. THIS FELLOW ATTACHES MORE IMPORTANCE TO THE PROFILE, WHILE HE IS FILLING UP TOTAL FALSE HOOD IN HIS PROFILE.
please visit the following link:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/lawyers_search/N-J-S-Rajkumar-alias-narasimha-254519.asp#.VIcRwmeHPFx
where he claims that he is practising from 2001, while as already indicated by me, he was enrolled only in the year 2012!!! CAN ANYBODY PRACTICE BEFORE ENROLMENT? IF ONE DOES SUCH A PRACTICE IS HE NOT FIT TO BE CALLED A "FRAUD"?
N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha's Details
Listed Under
Business Law
Civil Law
Criminal Law
Practicing Since
2001
Specialization
SEBI and SEBI RELATED CASES
Court
Others
Address
54,PARASURAMA EASWARAN KOIL WEST MADA STREET,AYANAVARAM,CHENNAI 600023
Other Details
rajkumar_wins@rediffmail.com 9444036927
Therefore, before taking advice, the querist should be too careful
