In above case VG5 (victims) lodged a complaint clearly stating that the facts that forgery has happened during registration & functioning of the society... with
- jurisdictional police station
- superintendent of police (SP) of the district
- District commisioner
though the complaint highlights cheating, cheating by impersonation, forgery for purpose of cheating, criminal conspiracy and highlights abeting others to be part of the crime.
the supporting documents produced at jurisdictional police station during filing of complaint where forgery has happened during registration and functioning of the society clearly show they are not original signatures of VG5 and also vary from page to page...where signatures have been forged.
the docments where singatures of VG6 have been forged even a common man can clearly make out the huge variation between original signatures and forged signatures.
the Police (SP office & jurisdictional station inspector) did not file FIR, sent away the complainents stating that they will investigate into this and have silently closed the case stating this is a civil case and asking the complainants to approcah court. Also in the closing statment by police they have highlighted a wrong name of entity -- complaint is on ABCD Education Association (R)...but police in closing statement have shown complaint is on ABCD Trust
The police did not call the complainents to discuss on this case before closing this case and also till date have not communicated to complainents on the case status. (the status was looked up in state home department website by the complainents)
Even the SP office has responded stating this is a civil case even without asking the complainents for any kind of documents to prove thier complaint.
As per what i have read online...this case clearly attracts IPC codes which are cognizable and non-bailable...but still terming this as a civil case by police has been very surprising and shocking.
This behavior by police officials (SP office and jurisdictional police station) clearly leads one to suspect that they have colluded with the accused and have acted in their favour.(derelection of duty)
It was with great courage the VG5 all women took a bold step to go lodge a complaint and this outcome has further shocked & frightened them.
After the police complaint was lodged the accused have threatned family members of the VG5 over phone/SMS/personal intimidation
the District commisioner has forwarded the complaint to District Registrar and it has been 2 months and yet no communication from District Registrar.
Please advise
1. if this is right proceedure followed by police department?
2. is this a civil case? (and no dereliction of duty by police)
3. if this is right proceedure followed by District commisioner and District Registrar?
4. what should be the next steps by VG5?
prior to giving complaint to police VG5 were frightened of the accused ...now after above development they are even more frieghtened that if they try to escalate this further there might be a bad reaction by police since VG5 suspect that police might have colluded with accused and closed this case as a civil matter.
Thanks in advance for your valuable time & advise on this.
(Note: i am not a law student or a lawyer...but a common man have been reading online about Law/IPC/etc after landing in this situation)