Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 12:29
Where one should complain for removing corrupt judge or MM, If one can prove that in a criminal case the corrupt judge /MM has passed a foul order intentionally ? Is it not important to weed out such thugs from judicial services ?
Any viable solution ?
Ashok Kumar Sharma
12 August 2010 at 11:52
Dear Sir,
I am of the opinion that the sc being at the top of Judiciary System, should take initiative to take cognizance of burning issues related to the mass as this mass can't be organised due to many constraints. Under these circumstances initiative taken by the sc shall not only give justice to the deprived but will also create general public in the the Indian Judiciary and the corners who are doing partial/malafied acts shall have to think in future and will not dare to repeat such acts minimising litigation. The recent example of discrimination is current wage revision in PSU Banks.
Please comment.
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 09:42
Dear All,
WHY BOTH INDIA AND PAKISTAN CANNOT SORT OUT THEIR DIFFERENCES QUA KASHMIR THROUGHT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
KINDLY SEND YOUR VIEWS AND OPINIONS
BEST REGARDS
pratik
12 August 2010 at 01:33
1) HOW IMPORTANT ROLE DOES WRIT HABEAS CORPUS PLAY IN ANY COURT? WHAT ARE ITS OBJECTIVES? HOW CAN ONE FILE A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN ANY COURT? ALSO WHICH COURT HAS THE JURISDICTION FORM THE WRIT HABEAS CORPUS ALSO HOW IT IS DIFFERENT FROM WRIT PETITION?
2) CAN ANBODY EXPLIN IN DETAIL WHEN, WHERE, WHY, HOW CAN FILE A WRIT PETITION & AS PER WHICH SECTION OR LAW. ALSO ADVANATGES TO FILE WRIT PETITION & TO FILE A ONLY A PETITION IN ANY MATTER BECAUSE I HAVE ASKED THIS QUESTION MANY TIMES BUT NO ONES WHAT'S TO ANSWER WHY I DONT KNOW. (I NEED FUL INFO ABOUT THE WRIT, PETITION & WRIT PETITION IN DETAIL PLS REPLY MY QUERY IT IS A HUMBALE REQUEST PLS .
THANKS A LOT
GODBLESS U ALL.
Ashok Kumar Sharma
11 August 2010 at 14:18
Dear Sir,
The recent scenario in regard to wage revision of PSU Bank Employees is very hot on legal corners. The recent development "vacation of stay" by Madras High Court on 10.08.2010 has given shock to the deprived corner.
When the issue is so burning and full of anomalies, why the Supreme Court should not take concern directly in view of matter pending in various lower/high courts to save countries time and give justice to the deprived ones. This act will send a good message to the countries citizens.
Pl. advice and comment what future is likely to be in this case?
Yogesha
10 August 2010 at 14:38
Hi everybody
I am yogesha. Actually some person A put one case against me, telling that i querreled with him and i injured him inthat fight. But actually no fight was took place. there were no proofs for it.
Finally after 6 to 7 months i won the case.
Court declared me as Innocent.
I dint do anything to him, just he booked a case against me and finally i won the case.But my question is, without doing anything i was made to fight the case, i was made to go to the court and i lost my prestige in front of freinds and neighbors.
So can i take any action against himor any other ways. If there are how?
Please help me.
gopal dutt vyas
09 August 2010 at 09:16
a section of media recently reported that retirement age has been raised to 65 years. i think this is not correct. what is the correct position ? what is the procedure for amending the retirement age of judges ?
Anonymous
06 August 2010 at 02:39
If there is any difference at all.
Anonymous
05 August 2010 at 14:37
Hi All:
What is the procedure for a resident Indian Citizen to change his / her name?
For example:
I a person's name is ABC.
He / She wants it to be changed to AB.
What is the procedure?
Regards
Soumya
Thanks All:
What is the procedure in Karnataka?
Regards
Soumya
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Infringement on Judiciary
LAYMAN NEWS:
The Finance Minister, Mr Pranab Mukherjee, spurned the demand of certain Members of Parliament to disclose the names of corporates defaulting in loan repayment to public sector banks.
The disclosure of their names in a public forum (such as Parliament) will make the banking industry more sick, Mr Mukherjee told the Lok Sabha. He also highlighted the aspect of confidentiality clauses (in loan agreements) coming in the way of releasing the names of defaulters.
“If this (disclosing names) is done, a person will be declared insolvent even before the Court declares them (defaulters) as insolvent. And whatever possibility of recovering money from them will go. It will be depositors' money that will be lost (if we disclose)”, he said.
LAWMAN'S VIEWS:
It is a clear case of influencing or misleading the Judiciary to dictate terms by the Senior Minister who has no business to shield the Economic Offenders who are responsible for mounting NPA in the banking industry. It would also facililtate all the proclaimed defaulters to remain the dark under the shield of top bosses in the Government. It appears he must be more worried about the interests of Corporate NPA borrowers than that of the depositors who save their hard earned money in Public Sector Banks.
I want our experts to post their opinion on Minister's statement infringing the basic tenets of our Judicial Administration System